AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Grace Gray-Adams

ART100 · MULT122 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

; only consider online MULT122 if you can self-manage through disorganization for an easy grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedClear How-To Videos OnlineExpensive Unused SuppliesPhone-In ClassRedo Assignments
  • Online MULT122 is easy with how-to videos and redo work, but often late and missing turn-in pages.
  • use, and wasted art supplies.
  • ; students warn others to pick someone else for real art learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Online students report A+ grades, easy quizzes, and redo rights, while but effort complaints center .

Easy-A evidence is strong online; in-person reviews focus on .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is beginner-level multimedia and intro art, though material warrants.

Online is rated difficulty 1; in-person students rate difficulty 5 due to poor delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

; others do not stress strict attendance.

Only in-person MULT122 clearly .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Would-take-again is 0% and .

Online comments are mixed-positive on clarity but still criticize disorganization; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Online allows assignment redos and produced A+ grades; .

Format shift

Leniency is documented online; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Online is mostly book exercises and quizzes; and confusion rather than heavy academic load.

Format shift

Online feels light; in-person burden is supplies and wasted class time.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

but chronic disorganization; as confusing, phone-focused, and not teaching art.

Format shift

Online quality ratings are 5s with organization caveats; in-person quality is 1-2.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and book exercises rather than formal high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments; exams are barely discussed.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students describe confusion, phone use during class, and expensive supply lists barely used, with little real art instruction.

Main concern

Students report she takes supplies without asking and teaches almost nothing about art.

What students said

“Grace was all over the place and hard to understand.”
MULT122
“All she does is be on her iPhone throughout the whole class and because she made us buy $300 worth of art supplies and we only ended up using about 25% of the supplies she listed.”
ART100

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online MULT122 feels easy with , and A+ grades, but due dates and turn-in pages are often late or missing.

Main concern

Chronic disorganization and .

What students said

“The quizzes are easy, she outlines each assignment with an exact how-to video. .”
MULT122
“ .”
MULT122

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews highlight easy quizzes and .

Easy QuizzesAssignment RedoHow-To Videos

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; complaints focus on lecture quality and supplies.

Lecture Heavy
“Grace was all over the place and hard to understand.”
MULT122

Online

Online work is quiz and assignment driven with and redo options; .

Easy QuizzesAssignment RedoLate Posting Risk
“The an exact how-to video.”
MULT122
“ .”
MULT122

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to learn Art.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (2 online, 2 in person), highlighting format-split teaching quality and organization issues. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Grace was all over the place and hard to understand.”

💻 Online Clarity

75/100

“The quizzes are easy, she outlines each assignment with an exact how-to video. .”

💸 Supply Waste

20/100

“she made us buy $300 worth of art supplies and we only ended up using about 25% of the supplies she listed.”

🔄 Redo Friendly Online

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Class

  • The an exact how-to video.
  • This class seems to be an afterthought to her.
  • .

Theme 2

🎨

  • I regretted taking her
  • All she does is be on her iPhone throughout the whole class
  • if you want to learn Art.

Theme 3

📂 About Organization

  • Multiple times she has while failing to put up a turn in page.
  • Or she posts the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four old reviews (2014-2016) split evenly online vs in person, with consistent format-based patterns but limited recent detail.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MULT1223 reviews
ART1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values