AI Rate Professor

History

Bonnie Harris

HIST101 · HIST100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can handle an extreme weekly workload and weak teaching support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming WorkloadPoor CommunicationGE OverloadAvoid If PossibleHeavy Reading
  • Both reviews rate quality low and difficulty maxed out
  • , and huge reading load
  • Teaching and communication for undergrads are described as weak

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Extreme weekly load and weak teaching make a high grade very costly and unlikely for many.

Both online and and low teaching support.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Massive reading, frequent quizzes, and and pace crushing.

; online emphasizes difficulty and poor teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

; online review does not show flexibility.

In-person explicitly mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Both students rate quality 2/5 and explicitly warn others away from the course.

Online and ; evidence is consistent though sparse.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

No signs of ; heavy assessments and .

Format shift

Both formats describe heavy assessment pressure without leniency notes.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

, and tons of boring reading.

Format shift

In-person lists concrete weekly overload; online also denies a walk in the park.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Called terrible at communication and teaching undergrads despite strong historian credentials.

Format shift

Online review focuses on teaching failure; .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Weekly quizzes and papers plus multiple midterms and large papers share assessment weight.

Format shift

In-person details assessment mix; online is less specific on format.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person HIST101 , and dense reading far beyond typical GE.

Main concern

Insane weekly workload for a general-ed undergrad course.

What students said

“For a general ed undergrad class, this teacher assigns an insane amount of work each week.”
HIST101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online HIST100 is not easy: interesting sources but weak communication and teaching for undergrads.

Main concern

Poor teaching communication can tank grades across the semester.

What students said

“This class is NOT a walk in the park. She provides a lot of interesting original sources but is TERRIBLE at communication/teaching.”
HIST100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent quizzes, three midterms, and .

Weekly QuizzesMultiple MidtermsLarge PapersHeavy Reading

Assessment risk

Standard

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person HIST101 , and three large papers.

Weekly QuizWeekly PaperThree MidtermsThree Large Papers
“Tons of , THREE midterms, THREE large papers.”
HIST101

Online

Online review but confirms the class is not easy.

Not Easy OnlineOriginal Sources Heavy
“This class is NOT a walk in the park.”
HIST100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“AVOID if you can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in-person), highlighting overload and weak undergrad teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“teaching undergrads is NOT her forte.”

📚 Workload Overload

8/100

“this teacher assigns an insane amount of work each week.”

👎 Recommendation

15/100

“AVOID if you can.”

📈 Difficulty

12/100

“This class is NOT a walk in the park.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • is TERRIBLE at communication/teaching.
  • I have no doubt that she is a wonderful historian. However, teaching undergrads is NOT her forte.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • assigns an insane amount of work each week
  • Tons of , THREE midterms, THREE large papers
  • This class is NOT a walk in the park.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2014 with consistent negativity, but sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST1001 review
HIST1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1