AI Rate Professor

English

Jen-Yong HO

ENGL60 · ENGL9731 · ENG101 · ENG100 · ENG120 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you care about learning English and will show up and do the work; do not expect a free ride.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate LecturerEngaging ClassroomNot an Easy AWorth the WorkNo Textbook Option
  • Most students call him a great, passionate English teacher who makes you want to work hard.
  • Workload can be heavy and the class is not framed as easy, but rewards effort.
  • Attendance and doing the work matter; one review notes no textbook.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Students say the class is straightforward if you care and put in time, but explicitly not an easy professor.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, but several reviews note real work and moderate difficulty.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

One review says he expects you to show up and do the work.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and teaching quality.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

as harsh or free; success tracks with effort and attendance.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Workload is repeatedly called quite a bit, though still manageable for committed students.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students praise engagement, passion, clarity, and the drive he creates to work hard.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Comments emphasize doing the work and showing .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students largely praise passion, engagement, and fair challenge with a non-trivial workload.

Main concern

Workload can be substantial and the course is not easy.

What students said

“Not an 'easy' Professor, but if you actually care about learning, you'll do fine in his class.”
ENG120
“Although the work load is quite a bit, he is one of the so far”
ENGL60
“he MAKES you want to work hard in his class. GREAT GUY!”
ENGL9731

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment feels standard and effort-based.

Standard Course Expectations

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, or strict proctoring details.

Standard Course Expectations
“Expects you to do the work and show up, but if you put a bit of time into it the class is very straightforward.”
ENG120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an 'easy' Professor, but if you actually care about learning, you'll do fine in his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting passion, engagement, and effort-based success. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“he is one of the so far”

👍 Recommendation Strength

86/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“Although the work load is quite a bit, he is one of the so far”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Engages all students, in his teaching style
  • You can tell he has a passion for what he is teaching
  • he MAKES you want to work hard in his class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an 'easy' Professor, but if you actually care about learning, you'll do fine
  • Although the work load is quite a bit
  • if you put a bit of time into it the class is very straightforward

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five mostly consistent in-person reviews from 2010-2014 give a but limited grade data and older dates cap confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1001 review
ENG1011 review
ENG1201 review
ENGL601 review
ENGL97311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values