AI Rate Professor

English

Elizabeth King

ENGLISH101 · ENG205 · ENG049 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · ENG49 · ENG43 · ENGL49 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want to become a stronger writer and will do the essays; if you only want an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Essay InstructorNot an Easy AHelpful HandoutsCaring but ToughEssay Heavy
  • , and preparation for later English courses.
  • multiple essays, revisions, and real work are required.
  • A and advise avoiding her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students say she is not an easy A and you must write, revise, show up, and put in real effort for high grades.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings vary; content can be manageable but prompts and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Comments advise not missing class and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, though a few strongly warn others away.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Fair for dedicated students; favoritism and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple essays, revisions, workshops, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and helpful; minority say she does not help enough or plays favorites.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and paper revisions rather than big exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and worthwhile, while a few cite tough grading, favoritism, or weak help.

Main concern

Heavy essay load and A.

What students said

“If you are serious about learning . She is not an easy A!”
ENG101
“ . and useful.”
ENG49
“ !”
ENGL205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay-heavy with workshops and prompts; .

Essay BasedPaper WorkshopsNo Proctoring Detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Course focuses on multiple essays and workshops rather than traditional proctored exams.

Multiple EssaysWorkshopsPaper Prompts
“Our class had 5 essays, where I've heard other teachers only assign 3.”
ENG101
“If you want an A it isn't hard but you need to do everything.”
ENG49

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are serious about learning . She is not an easy A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews, balancing praise for writing prep with workload and fairness concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ . and useful. I learned a lot in her class.”

📝 Not an Easy A

38/100

“She is not an easy A! Our class had 5 essays, where I've heard other teachers only assign 3.”

👍

72/100

“really ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and super sweet.
  • VERY SWEET YOUNG TEACHER. VERY SMART.
  • and as well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you want an A it isn't hard but you need to do everything.
  • If you are a dedicated student who wants to learn, you will probably get an 'A.'
  • This class was very easy and as a result, it did not prepare me enough for English 101.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Criticisms

  • She doesn't help very ,much> She expects you to know how to write a paper.
  • King is tough and seems to have her favorites in class.
  • Alot of work not good at correcting asignments in a timely manner,but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews from 2010-2014 give solid detail and mixed but and teaching quality.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1014 reviews
ENG494 reviews
ENG0491 review
ENG2051 review
ENG431 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGL2051 review
ENGL491 review
ENGLISH1011 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values