AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Patrick Pidgeon

PHIL102A · PHIL102B · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want transformative, discussion-driven philosophy rather than dry reading-only survey classes, knowing the sample size is small.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLife-changing philosophySelf-focused discussionsEnergetic and knowledgeableMemorable life lessonsUneven stability note
  • Students praise deep, personal philosophy that connects thinkers to self-growth.
  • Several report easy As and lasting life lessons when they engage.
  • One review calls him unstable; overall sample is small and older.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Reported grades include multiple As and lower difficulty for engaged students, though one review found it very hard.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is reflective philosophy that some find easy and others rate as difficult or intense.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most call him a negative stability comment.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Multiple A grades and positive tone suggest approachable grading when students engage, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is not detailed; difficulty ratings .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students emphasize genuine love of philosophy, energy, and life-changing discussion style.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews , so assessment mix remains general.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person PHIL102 sections feel personal and energizing for students who buy into self-reflective philosophy; one dissenting note flags instability.

Main concern

Limited reviews include one claim he is not stable, so experiences may vary.

What students said

“This man will change your life and ”
PHIL102A
“Life lessons learned that I will always remember”
PHIL102B
“Unique, very knowledgeable but not stable.”
PHIL102B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This man will change your life and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person philosophy reviews, highlighting personal impact and limited dissent. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Very knowledgeable, interesting, and energetic! Life lessons learned that I will always remember.”

🧠 Philosophy Approach

82/100

“He focuses the class on the self and uses the philosophers as a tool to do it.”

⚠️ Experience Variance

40/100

“Unique, very knowledgeable but not stable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • genuine love for Philosophy
  • He does philosophy the way it was meant to be done

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A
  • !
  • 5

Theme 3

💭 About Personal Impact

  • sense of meaning he provided me with in life
  • MISS THIS CLASS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

but one sharp dissent and sparse policy detail.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL102A3 reviews
PHIL102B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values