AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

N Lekmine

MATH119 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

one detailed review reports zero flexibility after a and recommends not taking her.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerNo student considerationSyllabus error deniedAvoidHarsh on makeupsUnaccountable
  • and a student missed the exam
  • Denied a
  • Single review strongly

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Difficulty is rated max and the only review describes punitive handling of a .

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

20/100

Rated extremely difficult, with a options.

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; inflexibility shows up around exam makeups rather than class meetings.

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only review explicitly says do not recommend and error.

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Denied a and refused to own the mistake.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload volume is not described; the and inflexibility.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Quality rated 1/5 with a report of zero consideration for the student's situation and no responsibility for a syllabus error.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The critical incident is an exam; other assessment methods are not discussed.

Format shift

All evidence comes from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person review describes a rigid, unforgiving experience after wrong exam dates on the syllabus led to a and a denied re-test.

Main concern

caused a missed exam.

What students said

“She posted the missing the exam. I requested a re-test pointing out the wrong dates on the syllabus, but I was denied.”
MATH119
“ . AVOID!!!”
MATH119

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

even after a syllabus date error.

Scheduled examsNo re-test after missed exam

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

wrong syllabus dates and a denied re-test; proctoring tools are not mentioned.

In-person exam scheduleNo re-test granted
“She posted the missing the exam. I requested a re-test pointing out the wrong dates on the syllabus, but I was denied.”
MATH119

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . AVOID!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting inflexibility, exam-date error, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

5/100

“ . AVOID!!!”

📅

12/100

“She posted the missing the exam.”

🧱

10/100

“I requested a syllabus, but I was denied.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Fairness & Policies

  • Has ABSOLUTELY NO consideration for a student's situation.
  • This teacher did not take responsibility for her own share of the mistake.
  • I requested a re-test ... but I was denied.

Theme 2

📉 About Overall Experience

  • . AVOID!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2011 review; highly specific and severe, but uncorroborated by additional students.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values