AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Dinnah Masangkay

NRSE142 · NRSE144 · NE105 · NUR107 · NE142 · NE101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle a high-pressure nursing instructor who is strict, unpredictable, and often harsh.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerYells at studentsHarsh clinical instructorDisorganized materialsStudents afraid to askHigh standards
  • Students describe yelling, intimidation, and fear of asking questions in clinical and lecture.
  • Lectures are often rushed, vague, or YouTube-heavy while and workload remain very hard.
  • A few note high standards and informative lectures, but tone and consistency undercut learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and standards stay high, so an A takes sustained effort and still feels uncertain.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and comments , and tough clinical expectations show real content and performance pressure.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed beyond normal in-person nursing expectations.

; only in-person comments exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students warn about yelling, fear, weak organization, and a clinical style that blocks learning.

Recommendation tone is .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Students say small mistakes are punished hard and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

and clinical prep are described as excessive and poorly streamlined.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few call lectures informative, but late starts, rushed content, yelling, and weak clinical coaching dominate.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear driven by lecture prep plus difficult skills and clinical performance checks.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and clinical reviews cluster around intimidation, disorganization, and hard skills standards, with only occasional praise for informative lectures.

Main concern

Yelling, fear-based clinical style, and harsh reactions when students cannot answer make learning stressful.

What students said

“In a word, HORRIBLE. Late every day, lectures rushed and mostly YouTube videos, yells at students, most students are afraid of her.”
NRSE144
“She started barking at me. That is not teaching. She should have been a concentration camp guard.”
NE101
“I would have learned more if I wasn't afraid to ask a question.”
NRSE142

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Skills exams and clinical questioning are described as strict and high-stakes rather than student-friendly.

Hard skills examinationsHigh clinical standardsHeavy lecture readings

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person skills examinations and clinical questioning are hard to pass and intimidating.

Hard skills examinationsClinical oral questioningHigh performance standards
“Hard to pass her skills examinations.”
NE142
“I just don't like the way reacts when you aren't able to answer a question.”
NRSE142

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“In a word, HORRIBLE. Late every day, lectures rushed and mostly YouTube videos, yells at students, most students are afraid of her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting intimidation, workload, and clinical strictness. Credibility rating: Medium.

😤 Teaching Climate

28/100

“She started barking at me. That is not teaching.”

😰 Fear Blocks Learning

30/100

“I would have learned more if I wasn't afraid to ask a question.”

📚 Heavy Expectations

30/100

“ and the amount of resources she uses and expects you to study per lecture could be much more streamlined.”

Theme 1

👩‍⚕️ About Clinical Style

  • yells at students, most students are afraid of her
  • She started barking at me
  • I would have learned more if I wasn't afraid to ask a question

Theme 2

📚 About Lectures and Workload

  • lectures rushed and mostly YouTube videos
  • Hard to pass her skills examinations
  • materials and the activities are totally disorganised

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed in-person reviews from 2010-2012 are thematically consistent but old and limited in sample size.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NE1422 reviews
NE1011 review
NE1051 review
NRSE1421 review
NRSE1441 review
Show 1 more courses
NUR1071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values