AI Rate Professor

English

John Myers

ENG205 · ENGLISH205 · ENG114 · ENG42 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGENG · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Do not take this professor if a strong English grade.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard to pleaseUnclear expectationsEndless revisionsUnhelpful feedbackNot recommended
  • Nearly , and harsh on essays.
  • Students report endless revisions without useful guidance and almost no path to an A.
  • as he ridicules answers and changes expectations mid-semester.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students repeatedly say he barely gives As, is nearly impossible to please, and blocks grade recovery despite many revisions.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Content itself is less the , and demoralizing class dynamics that make the course feel hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students because he does not teach clearly and destroys confidence.

Recommendation is .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Comments stress no As, hard-to-please essay scoring, and personal or .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Endless paper revisions and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students , and almost no useful teaching.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on essays and repeated revisions rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All in-person English reviews describe confusing instruction, , and low morale.

Main concern

impossible to improve.

What students said

“Pretty terrible! Sums it up, he does not give out A's, your lucky if you can pull a B.”
ENG205
“By far the . He doesn't teach, he doesn't answer questions thoroughly, reads off the board.”
ENGENG
“ !!! He likes to ridicule everybody in that class by going over everything you turned in a overhead.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and repeated rewrites rather than proctored tests.

Essay-heavy assessmentEndless revisionsUnclear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

while and hard to satisfy.

Essay revisionsUnclear expectationsHarsh paper grading
“Revision after revision and you get the same score, very hard to please.”
ENGENG
“be prepared to do alot of revising-this teacher is very hard to please.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! He likes to ridicule everybody in that class by going over everything you turned in a overhead.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person reviews, highlighting grading harshness and teaching failure. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

8/100

“ .”

📝

12/100

“he does not give out A's, your lucky if you can pull a B.”

😶

12/100

“terrible teacher! incomprehinsible! extreamly poor teaching and communication skills.”

Theme 1

📝 About Essays and Grades

  • Revision after revision and you get the same score
  • he does not give out A's
  • be prepared to do alot of revising

Theme 2

👎 About Teaching Style

  • He doesn't teach, he doesn't answer questions thoroughly
  • reads off the board
  • Save your dignity and self esteem! Stay away!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen consistently negative in-person reviews across several years provide a large, coherent evidence base.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 57
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG1017 reviews
ENG2055 reviews
ENG1141 review
ENG421 review
ENGENG1 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGL1011 review
ENGLISH2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values