AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Patrick Geyer

ANTHR102 · ANTH105 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

passable if you show up and , but skip if you want fair, focused testing.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtra credit availableTest-heavy gradingGrammar-strict papersLecture-to-test mismatchSkip the textbook
  • Grades rest on a .
  • One review says easy with ; another calls him unpredictable and self-focused on tests.
  • Textbook is skippable via library reserves.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One class felt easy with ; the and mismatched tests.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings and comments split between easy lectures and harder, unpredictable exams.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but showing up and listening is tied to passing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

One student found it easy and practical; .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

helps some, but and tests feel picky.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

Only a few tests and one journal critique; .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Powerpoints help some students, others say he talks about himself and tests off-topic.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

journal critique.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and a journal critique, with powerpoints and optional textbook use.

Main concern

Tests may not match lectures and .

What students said

“It's really easy to pass so long as you show up and listen to the lectures and look up the powerpoints online.”
ANTH105
“ but will ask u something different on the test.”
ANTHR102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

A few high-stakes tests and one paper; some students report .

Three examsJournal critiquePowerpoints not always matching tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Three exams and one journal critique form most of the grade; tests may diverge from slides.

Three examsJournal critiqueLecture-test mismatch
“Your grade is based on 3 tests, and one journal critique, each taking up a quarter of .”
ANTH105
“ but will ask u something different on the test.”
ANTHR102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's really easy to pass so long as you show up and listen to the lectures and look up the powerpoints online.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews spanning 2011-2012. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Will talk all about himself a lot and will ask questions about himself on the test.”

📚 Workload

68/100

“Your grade is based on 3 tests, and one journal critique, each taking up a quarter of .”

⚠️ Recommendation Split

42/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's really easy to pass so long as you show up and listen to the lectures
  • He also gives a lot of
  • He grades ur paper like an English class and

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but will ask u something different on the test
  • Will talk all about himself a lot
  • Don't buy the book

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews from 2011-2012 with split opinions and no grade data.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH1051 review
ANTHR1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values