AI Rate Professor

Computer & Informational Tech.

Donald Hester

MSFT130 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if and email; do not expect in-person coaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRemote Availability OnlyLabSim HeavySelf-Directed ITLimited Support
  • Single review describes remote professor reachable only by email
  • LabSim sections can be challenging even for Windows-strong students
  • Little instructional help beyond textbook and software labs

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Even a self-described sharp Windows student found sections challenging and got limited help, so an A likely needs real effort.

Based on the single in-person MSFT130 review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

LabSim content is called somewhat difficult with hard sections even for experienced Windows users.

Difficulty evidence is only from the one in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; the class appears software-lab driven with remote instructor contact.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Quality is middling; useful only if you can handle LabSim alone, not if you need hands-on instructor help.

Recommendation inferred from one in-person comment only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; outcomes hinge on mastering LabSim sections.

Format shift

No grade details in the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and can feel heavy when sections are hard and help is scarce.

Format shift

Workload inferred only from the in-person LabSim comment.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Instructor is distant and email-only; students must self-drive labs without local support.

Format shift

Teaching access described only in the one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on LabSim lab sections .

Format shift

Only LabSim-style work is mentioned in the in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One MSFT130 review notes LabSim difficulty and a professor based in .

Main concern

No local help and challenging LabSim sections with .

What students said

“There is no help for this class, professor is in .”
MSFT130

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

LabSim Sections

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do ; the noted assessment path is LabSim lab sections.

LabSim Sections
“Online, somewhat difficult sections in the LabSim.”
MSFT130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is no help for this class, professor is in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review focused on LabSim difficulty and . Credibility rating: Low.

📧 Remote-Only Support

50/100

“There is no help for this class, professor is in .”

💻 LabSim Challenge

35/100

“I'm pretty sharp when it comes to Windows and I found certain section challenging.”

Theme 1

🖥️ About Course Format

  • Online, somewhat difficult sections in the LabSim.
  • professor is in .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty

  • somewhat difficult sections in the LabSim
  • I found certain section challenging.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2012 review with limited detail and no grade or , so confidence is low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MSFT1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values