AI Rate Professor

English

C Farquar

ENG049 · ENG205 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you want a strong English teacher and are ready to read and write at a high level.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExcellent instructorFair graderHigh standardsESL-awareUpper-division rigor
  • Both reviews rate him excellent and fair.
  • , and writing.
  • but still holds college-level standards.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible with , but and writing demand real effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students warn that upper-division English requires strong comprehension and writing skill.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Both students rate him excellent and one calls the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Students call grading fair, and one finished with an A after expecting a lower grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Upper-division courses require substantial reading, comprehension, and writing preparation.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

, and support for ESL students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews stress reading and writing performance overall without detailing a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but demanding, with and high writing expectations.

Main concern

Upper-division and writing readiness.

What students said

“EXCELLENT!!!!!! Warning though. If you're going to take Eng 205 or any of the other upper division Eng courses, be prepared.”
ENG205
“Very informative and fair in .”
ENG049

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Comments focus on reading and writing expectations rather than proctoring tools or open-book rules.

Writing-focused standardsLimited exam logistics detail

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and writing standards without naming proctoring tools.

High writing expectationsReading comprehension focus
“expects you to read, comprehend, and write to the expected level of the class.”
ENG205
“Very informative and fair in .”
ENG049

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“EXCELLENT!!!!!! Warning though. If you're going to take Eng 205 or any of the other upper division Eng courses, be prepared.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting excellence, fairness, and upper-division rigor. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“EXCELLENT!!!!!!”

⚖️

68/100

“Very informative and fair in .”

📚 High Standards

28/100

“expects you to read, comprehend, and write to the expected level of the class.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

92/100

“I like his class. Very informative and fair in .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • EXCELLENT!!!!!!
  • He understands ESL students needs
  • Very informative

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • be prepared.
  • I thought I had a high C or low B in his class but I made an A in the end.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two glowing in-person reviews from 2010-2011 exist, so confidence is limited despite strong consistency.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG0491 review
ENG2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values