AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Francisco Salgado

PHIL102A · PHILO100 · PHILO235 · PHIL102B · PHILO102A · PHIL100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

A solid pick for approachable philosophy if you show up, use office hours, and can handle mixed lecture clarity.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPassionate PhilosopherEntertaining LecturesStudy Guides HelpfulAttendance ImportantMixed Clarity
  • Many students like his passion, humor, and willingness to help in office hours
  • Course content is often manageable, with and flexible deadlines
  • Attendance and participation matter, and clarity of notes is uneven

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Classes are often not brutal, but starting slow can cost an A and hard work is still needed.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Most difficulty ratings are low and students call the material manageable rather than brain-burning.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Students say and participation is valued.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and support, while a minority give only average marks.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Respect for student opinions on deadlines and passable difficulty .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

No flood of homework is described, but , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Passion, entertainment, and office hours stand out, though .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Tests with study guides, class participation, and group work all appear in the comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students generally enjoy his entertaining, passionate style and find the class doable with effort, study guides, and office hours, though notes and rigor draw mixed comments.

Main concern

, and a few students were only lukewarm on overall quality.

What students said

“I really enjoyed this class and the way the professor explained things.”
PHILO100
“ .”
PHILO235
“ .”
PHIL102B
“he is an excellent Professor and .”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and some flexibility on dates, with .

Study GuidesFlexible Test DatesClass Participation

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and flexibility around deadlines and test dates.

Study GuidesFlexible Test Dates
“ .”
PHILO235
“Respects students' opinion on deadlines and test dates.”
PHILO235

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he is an excellent Professor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2011, highlighting passion, supports, and attendance; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Professor Salgado is very passionate about what he teaches.”

📝 Student Supports

65/100

“ .”

📍

30/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation

74/100

“he is an excellent Professor and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very entertaining too
  • Super funny and open minded
  • passionate about what he teaches

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • this class isn't brutually hard nor is it easy
  • If you work hard you can pass this class
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • He had time before class to speak to him if we had questions
  • He offers office hours that really helped to clarify any questions I had.
  • Respects students' opinion on deadlines and test dates.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from 2009-2011 give a consistent picture of , but the sample is older and mixed on clarity.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL102B2 reviews
PHIL1001 review
PHIL102A1 review
PHILO1001 review
PHILO102A1 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILO2351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values