AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Bryan Bowie

CHEM201 · CHEM200 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a fair, low-stress instructor in a still-challenging course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSuper chillFair graderExtra credit friendlyPowerPoint lecturesLaid-back chemistry
  • Students call him chill, funny, and fair even though chem itself is hard.
  • , and .
  • Lectures are PowerPoint-heavy rather than board-worked examples.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Chem stays hard, but , drops, and fair curves make a strong grade attainable with steady work.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students repeatedly note chem 200/201 is not easy even under a chill instructor.

Course difficulty is described only in in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and calls him chill, fair, and helpful.

Recommendation is uniformly positive in the in-person set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and a friendly curve are common.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and standard chem workload with .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Laid-back, funny, and .

Format shift

Teaching praise is consistent across the small in-person sample.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Exams and a multiple-choice final .

Format shift

Assessment pattern is described in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students consistently praise , and helpful extras in tough chem courses.

Main concern

PowerPoint-heavy lectures may not suit students who need many board examples.

What students said

“Bowie is super chill. He is not easy, but chem 201 is not easy. lots of and gives a .”
CHEM201
“Bowie is awesome. thats all you need to know. teaches chem in a laid back low stress environment.”
CHEM200
“ and reflected the lecture material, can be a .”
CHEM200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are fair and lecture-aligned, with one review noting an .

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams match lecture material and can include a and curves.

Fair testsMultiple-choice finalDrops lowest examOnline homework
“ .”
CHEM200
“ and reflected the lecture material”
CHEM200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Bowie is super chill. He is not easy, but chem 201 is not easy. lots of and gives a . take him you wont regret it”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting chill teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

😎 Chill Teaching Style

80/100

“teaches chem in a laid back low stress environment. .”

👍

82/100

“ . This id for the lecture only.”

⚖️

76/100

“ and really helpful.”

🧪 Chem Still Hard

35/100

“Hard teacher but it was chem 201.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Bowie is super chill
  • Hes funny which helps to

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • lots of and gives a
  • and 3 lowest homework assignments
  • although i didnt need it

Theme 3

🖥️ About Lecture Format

  • Powerpoint lecture
  • He does not write on the board that much
  • The hw is online

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews from 2010-2011 agree closely, but the sample is small and outdated.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM2003 reviews
CHEM2012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values