AI Rate Professor

Graphic Design

Lisa Starace

ARTG124 · ARTG106 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want strong design growth and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDemanding projectsGreat feedbackLearn a tonCreative process deep-diveWorth the effort
  • Classes are demanding with many deadlines and projects
  • Students say the workload pays off in real skill growth

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A and effort; nobody describes this as a free or easy A.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Classes are demanding with heavy projects and high expectations for design growth.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Both reviews urge taking any class she teaches because of feedback and learning payoff.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

; focus is on high standards and useful critique rather than free grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many deadlines and projects; students must plan serious work time.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

, and deep coverage of the creative process.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment centers on projects, deadlines, and design work rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and major creative growth.

Main concern

Very demanding deadlines and project load.

What students said

“Her classes are very demanding, so plan to work & have a lot of deadlines/projects.”
ARTG124
“She is a great teacher who helped me reach new heights in my design work.”
ARTG106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and .

Project-based assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and deadlines, not exam proctoring details.

Project-based assessment
“plan to work & have a lot of deadlines/projects”
ARTG124

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 and strong mentoring. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She works hard in her classes to give good feedback, give informative, pertinent & useful information”

💪 Heavy Workload

25/100

“Her classes are very demanding, so plan to work & have a lot of deadlines/projects.”

👍

92/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • give good feedback, give informative, pertinent & useful information
  • goes into great detail about the creative process

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very demanding, so plan to work & have a lot of deadlines/projects
  • if you put in the time & effort

Theme 3

🎨 About Growth

  • helped me reach new heights in my design work
  • you will learn a ton

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two highly positive 2010 reviews with good detail but tiny sample and no grade data.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTG1061 review
ARTG1241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values