AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Bob Geiser

MATH35 · MATH95 · MATH032 · MATH035 · MATH38 · ALG35 · MATH45 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid this professor; and answer questions.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesTalks about himselfMust self-teachMandatory attendanceShould retire
  • Students widely call him the and urge others not to enroll.
  • He mumbles through problems, rambles about personal life, and rarely answers questions clearly.
  • , yet students still must learn almost entirely from the textbook.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Poor explanations and unavailable help make earning an A depend .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Core math topics become much harder because lectures lack clarity and students cannot follow his board work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Students say you must attend or risk being dropped even though class time adds little learning value.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly every review and describes a teaching disaster.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

One student called him fair, but most reviews focus on .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload is mainly self-study from the .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say he talks to himself, mumbles answers, rambles about personal life, and fails to teach clearly.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize lecture failure and and assignments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math sections are described as , and poorly taught, with and little useful help.

Main concern

You must teach yourself from the book while and .

What students said

“ ~! .. ..no one understands his teachings but himself..no clarity..”
MATH95
“This is a class you HAVE to attend because but you have to learn the material by yourself with your book.”
ALG35
“Bottom line is.... he needs to retire as soon as possible. ... !!!”
MATH45

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Self-study heavyUnclear exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book policy, or proctoring rules.

Unclear exam policy
“horrible horrible horrible ...not very good at answering questions ..and cant seem to keep the interest of his students”
MATH35

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ~! .. ..no one understands his teachings but himself..no clarity..”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2010, highlighting teaching failure and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

15/100

“this professor (and I use that term loosely) is the .”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ !!!”

📌

12/100

“This is a class you HAVE to attend because but you have to learn the material by yourself with your book.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He talks to himself when he is working out a problem on the board.
  • He likes to hear himself talk.
  • no one understands his teachings but himself..no clarity..

Theme 2

📉 About Difficulty & Dropout

  • I had to "W" his class along with the whole class
  • at the begggining of the yr there was about 40 students in the class, at the end, there were about 7 left
  • you have to learn the material by yourself with your book

Theme 3

💔 About Helpfulness

  • If you need help he isn't avaible.
  • He's not much of help.
  • Geiser is not helpfull what so ever!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Ten consistently negative older in-person reviews provide a , but they are dated and lack grade detail.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ALG353 reviews
MATH352 reviews
MATH0321 review
MATH0351 review
MATH381 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH451 review
MATH951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values