AI Rate Professor

English

Annalisa Wilson

ENGL101 · ENGL205 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Consider Wilson for ENGL101 if you will complete work and tutoring visits; be cautious for higher-level English sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing reviewsFair grading in 101Heavy workload in 205Slow feedbackRequired tutoring visits
  • ENGL101 students can earn A or B by attending and doing work
  • ENGL205 reviews call her confusing with heavy work and
  • Experience appears course-dependent and mixed overall

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

ENGL101 can yield A or B with consistent work, but ENGL205 is described as a lot of work with .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Mixed courses include a difficult ENGL205 with heavy workload and a moderate ENGL101 that still requires thinking.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Showing up helps grades in 101, and required English-center .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

One student strongly recommends her for ENGL101 while another finds ENGL205 confusing and poorly supported.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

ENGL101 grading called fair with A or B for completed work; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

ENGL205 is a lot of work and ENGL101 adds ten required English-center tutoring visits.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Praise for making students think in 101 is offset by confusing teaching and slow feedback in 205.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assignments and required tutoring visits dominate comments more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

fair and recommendable in ENGL101, confusing and heavy in ENGL205.

Main concern

Higher-level classes may , and confusion.

What students said

“If you show up to class and , and she was great about making you 'think'.”
ENGL101
“ . The class is a lot of work and the and poor.”
ENGL205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; grades appear driven by assignments and tutoring requirements.

Assignment-heavyRequired tutoring visits

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews ; ENGL101 stresses assignments and tutoring visits, while ENGL205 stresses heavy work and .

Assignment-heavyRequired tutoring visits
“The only thing I didn't like about the class is the 10 required visits to the english center for tutoring.”
ENGL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up to class and , and she was great about making you 'think'.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting course-level split between fair 101 and harsh 205 experiences. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Mixed Recommendation

48/100

“ and .”

📚 Heavy Workload Risk

28/100

“The class is a lot of work and the and poor.”

🎯 Teaching Clarity Split

52/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she was great about making you 'think'
  • and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you show up to class and
  • The class is a lot of work and the and poor
  • the 10 required visits to the english center for tutoring

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only two 2010 reviews with opposite tones and no grade distribution, so the mixed picture has low statistical reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1011 review
ENGL2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values