AI Rate Professor

Rehabilitative Studies

Anne Marie Stokes

AODS101 · AODS150 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid if possible; reviews describe uncaring, unfocused teaching that nearly drove students away from the major.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUncaringTalks about personal lifeTitle-focusedBoringAvoid
  • Students describe uncaring, title-focused teaching with little engagement
  • Classes filled with personal life talk instead of useful content
  • if

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned an A- but reviews emphasize poor teaching more than free grades, so an A is not clearly effortless.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Difficulty ratings are mostly low, but content delivery is weak so learning is limited rather than intellectually hard.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students call her the and uncaring, and urge others not to risk taking her.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One reported A- exists, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not the main complaint; issues center on .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews describe bad teaching, agitation, personal oversharing, and failure to read student work.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Research papers are mentioned but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as boring, uncaring, and overly personal, with little effective teaching.

Main concern

Professor focuses on title and personal life instead of student learning.

What students said

“ ..Throws in your face her title”
AODS150
“ .”
AODS150
“ if possible.”
AODS150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting uncaring teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ ..Throws in your face her title, you have to call her professor, bad teaching”

👎 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ if possible.”

💔 Student Care

20/100

“Wasn't caring enough about students, .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • bad teaching, too much personal info.
  • seemed too wiped out, agitated, and crabby
  • Focus was more on her title of professor than on class.

Theme 2

💔 About Character

  • Wasn't caring enough about students, .
  • She seems jaded and unhappy, and did not care about the class.

Theme 3

🚫 About Taking Again

  • .
  • because of her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistently negative older reviews (2005-2010) form a coherent pattern but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

AODS1503 reviews
AODS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values