AI Rate Professor

English

Gary Lain

ENG205 · ENG101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if and rewrites, but evidence is limited.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful with papersAllows rewritesDry humorUses filmsWriting support
  • and allows rewrites
  • Uses books and films with
  • Only one substantive review; second rating has no comments

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Rewrites help grades, but ENG205 is rated difficulty 5 and no grades are reported as free A's.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Average difficulty sits around moderate to high, with one course rated 5 for difficulty.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

The detailed review is clearly positive about help with papers and class structure.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Allowed rewrites and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Papers and frequent book use imply a standard writing workload rather than featherlight.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and dry humor made ENG101 a loved class.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on papers with rewrites rather than described exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

with rewrites and a dry sense of humor.

Main concern

Very limited comment detail and only one informative review.

What students said

“ due and allowed rewrites for those that needed it.”
ENG101
“Funny, dry sense of humor.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and rewrites; .

Paper-based assessmentRewrites allowed

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; assessment appears paper-focused with rewrite opportunities.

Paper-based assessmentRewrites allowed
“ due and allowed rewrites for those that needed it.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ due and allowed rewrites for those that needed it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews (only one with comments), highlighting paper support and humor. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Loved this class. Used the books frequently but utilized films as well.”

📝 Writing Support

80/100

“ due and allowed rewrites for those that needed it.”

😄 Classroom Tone

75/100

“Funny, dry sense of humor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loved this class. Used the books frequently but utilized films as well.
  • Funny, dry sense of humor.

Theme 2

📝

  • due and allowed rewrites for those that needed it.
  • We used global warming as a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only two ratings, one without comments, and limited recent detail reduce confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1011 review
ENG2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values