AI Rate Professor

Geography

Kate Pittman

GEOG101 · GEO101 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you must take GEOG101 and are ready to teach yourself with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy HomeworkWeak Subject CommandBoring LecturesSelf-Teach GeographyIncompetent Educator
  • Most students say she lacks geography knowledge and relies on the text.
  • and often called mind-numbing or laborious.
  • A minority finds her knowledgeable if you stay in contact and study hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Heavy nightly homework and a B is possible.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content difficulty is raised by weak instruction and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

Students say attending class is important, but a .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most reviews call her inept, boring, or a last resort; only a .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

One student got a B after misery; and workload complaints.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Repeated reports of lots of , and time-consuming busywork.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is poor preparation, weak subject knowledge, boring delivery, and students teaching themselves.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Homework, extra assignments, and ; exams are mentioned but .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person GEO/GEOG101 is widely seen as ; many urge students to self-study or switch professors.

Main concern

Perceived subject incompetence and overwhelming busywork.

What students said

“she's the though... flat out incompetent as an educator.”
GEOG101
“Run away from this class. Run!”
GEOG101
“ .”
GEO101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests need deep studying and ; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or special proctoring.

Tests Require Deep StudyingHeavy HomeworkTextbook-Based

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

loads; proctoring details are not clearly stated.

Tests Require Deep StudyingHeavy Homework
“ . .”
GEO101
“she will provide you with night after night of mind-numbing assignments”
GEOG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she's the though. She seems to be a decent person, but she is flat out incompetent as an educator.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting weak teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Does not seem to be knowledgeable in her field... Relies on text to lecture and answer questions.”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“She does give a lot of work... If you are lazy, and can't handle a lot of .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“Run away from this class. Run!”

📖 Self-Teaching Need

30/100

“ , unless you want to end up teaching yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is never prepared to give a class or lecture
  • she is superrrrrrrrr borrrring
  • My classmates seem to know more about geography than she does

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • She gives a lot of work
  • night after night of mind-numbing assignments
  • and uninspiring

Theme 3

💔 About Overall Experience

  • Horrible teacher one of the
  • Use only as a last resort. Bring aspirin
  • I AM SOOOOO FRUSTRATED

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven mostly consistent 2008-2009 reviews strongly agree on weak teaching and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 57
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GEOG1018 reviews
GEO1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values