AI Rate Professor

Astronomy

Rose Moyer

MATH116 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

single review paints a teaching disaster with failed students and unanswered questions.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRun AwayCannot Answer QuestionsFailed ClassUseless LecturesVery Hard
  • Only review urges students to run and calls him useless as a math teacher.
  • Strong A student reports failing along with many classmates.
  • Professor could not answer student questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

An A math student failed this class along with many others.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Rated extremely hard and students report failing despite prior math success.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The only review opens with RUN and calls the professor useless.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Reported failures for strong math students suggest unforgiving outcomes.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

High difficulty rating and mass failures imply a very tough course load.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Student says he could not answer any questions and was useless as a math teacher.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe the mix of assignments versus exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person MATH116 review calls him useless, unable to answer questions, and a reason strong students failed.

Main concern

Cannot answer questions and students report failing the class.

What students said

“RUN! i did not have him for astronomy but as a math teacher he was useless.”
MATH116

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“RUN! i did not have him for astronomy but as a math teacher he was useless.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting failure risk and unanswered questions. Credibility rating: Low.

🚨 Teaching Quality

12/100

“as a math teacher he was useless”

📉 Grade Outcomes

12/100

“I am an A math student but I failed this class (along with many others)”

❓ Help Availability

10/100

“he could not answer any questions”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • as a math teacher he was useless
  • he could not answer any questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I am an A math student but I failed this class (along with many others)
  • RUN!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old 2009 review with strong negative detail but no corroboration.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values