AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

N Abdelkader

PHIL102 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if and ; expect test-heavy evaluation and mandatory presence.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest HeavyBiased DiscussionsMandatory AttendanceGraded By Few ThingsTerrible Teacher
  • and participation with .
  • Discussions felt biased and frustrating when the class was quiet.
  • and the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A C with and few graded items makes an A feel effortful and risky.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty was rated 4 and assessment and participation.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and tags warn that skipping class means you will not pass.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

and called her a terrible teacher despite being a .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Few graded components and a C outcome with .

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, but tests and required participation still create real pressure.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Discussions felt biased and teaching quality was called terrible despite a .

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

and participation with .

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person PHIL102 was test-heavy, attendance-mandatory, and felt biased in .

Main concern

and participation with .

What students said

“ and based the and participation. Nice lady but a terrible teacher. ):”
PHIL102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is concentrated on tests with few other graded cushions.

Test HeavyGraded By Few Things

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and graded by few things besides participation.

Test HeavyGraded By Few Things
“ and based the and participation.”
PHIL102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice lady but a terrible teacher. ):”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting biased discussion and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Nice lady but a terrible teacher. ):”

📝

28/100

“ and based the and participation.”

🚫 Recommendation

20/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very biased teacher when she has discussions.
  • Nice lady but a terrible teacher. ):

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • based the and participation
  • TEST HEAVY

Theme 3

🚪

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • Yes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Single detailed 2017 review is vivid but too thin for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1021 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values