AI Rate Professor

English

Rodrigo Gomez

ENG205 · ENG101X · ENGL105 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · ENGL101 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
44%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you can self-manage heavy writing and ; online is the riskiest format.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPoor email responseLots of papersParticipation mattersPolarizingAI-focused lectures
  • some find him engaging and growth-oriented, others call communication and organization a disaster.
  • Email silence and , especially online.
  • Heavy writing load and coasting.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

, and needing revisions or major effort to earn high marks.

Online students more often report zeros from closed gamified systems; and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Heavy weekly reading and a breeze.

Both formats stress workload; and multi-page essays.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Attendance is frequently marked mandatory, with participation mattering for success.

In-person is more attendance-driven; as no or not provided.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

About 44% would take again, matching the strong love-or-hate split in comments.

; online recommendation is dragged down by communication failures.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and , and hard paper standards appear often.

Format shift

Some online students call him an ; many others report harsh or .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Weekly papers, long readings, and lots of .

Format shift

Both formats report heavy writing; in-person often adds 30+ page weekly readings.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Passionate, engaging lectures for some students; vanishing communication and vague materials for others.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger; online quality is heavily damaged by non-response.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and sometimes a portfolio final rather than classic exams.

Format shift

Online and and assignments over traditional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person experiences range from fun critical-thinking lectures , and still-poor email replies.

Main concern

Heavy reading and who want light work.

What students said

“Prof Gomez is great at engaging students and making them think critically about their world. His course requires lots of participation, reading, and engagement.”
ENG205
“There is and an 8-10 pg essay due every 3 weeks.”
ENGL205
“His lectures were SO much fun. I learned so much about creative writing and he always graded my papers thoughtfully. .”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews often slam , and Classcraft pitfalls, with a minority still praising passion and feedback.

Main concern

Near-zero email response and .

What students said

“If . Poor communication !!!!!!! Which is terrible if you're online.”
ENGL205
“NOT ONCE did he respond to any of my messages or questions. and weird.”
ENGL205
“Do not take this professor online. Classcraft is probably the .”
ENGL105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly essays and portfolios with .

Essay heavyPortfolio finalMultiple revisionsParticipation based

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

sources, and sometimes a portfolio of course work.

Weekly papersLong readingsPortfolio finalParticipation matters
“There is and an 8-10 pg essay due every 3 weeks.”
ENGL205
“He requires students to pass all 3 essays to pass his class as well as the work done from his class.”
ENG101X

Online

Online reviews emphasize weekly writing and platform workflows more than formal proctored exams.

Weekly writing assignmentsEssay revisionsMulti-platform submissions
“Of course, it's not an easy class and you will have to work for an "A," but you are mostly graded based on your essays which can be revised multiple times.”
ENG205
“Basically one big writing assignment to do every week. He's a , and he gives good comments on all writing.”
ENGL205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the professor. The entire time I was in this class, NOT ONCE did he respond to any of my messages or questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting polarization on communication, writing load, and engagement. Credibility rating: High.

📧 Communication Gaps

25/100

“If . Poor communication !!!!!!! Which is terrible if you're online.”

✍️ Workload Reality

24/100

“There is and an 8-10 pg essay due every 3 weeks.”

🧠 Engagement Upside

70/100

“Prof Gomez is great at engaging students and making them think critically about their world.”

👍 Recommendation Split

44/100

“Rodrigo Gomez got a lot of bad reviews, but after taking his class it was actually really enjoyable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were SO much fun.
  • making them think critically about their world
  • Half the lecture is almost always about AI or NFTs.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • you will have to work for an "A"
  • So many papers

Theme 3

📧 About Communication

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

25 reviews across years with rich detail and recurring themes on communication and workload make the signal reliable despite polarization.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ENG2058 reviews
ENGL2056 reviews
ENG1015 reviews
ENG101X4 reviews
ENGL1011 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4