AI Rate Professor

English

Rodriguez Gomez

ENGLISH101 · ENG205 · ENGLISH205 · CRN86310 · ENG105 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
51.85%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a and can tolerate disorganization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing English instructorHeavy papers and busyworkDisorganized multi-platform gradingIntellectual but messyRewrites possible if you show up
  • Reviews split hard between inspiring intellectual mentor and
  • , and multi-site submission systems frustrate many students
  • Students who use office hours and rewrites can still earn As and grow as writers

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are possible, especially with rewrites, but many students report and .

Online sample is tiny and mixed; in-person dominates and shows high effort for grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Lots of reading, papers, discussions, and ambiguous assignments make the course intellectually and logistically hard.

; in-person adds more complaints about volume and chaos.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

, and missing class can mean missing which platform to submit on.

In-person more often mandatory; but contact is still poor.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; love him for growth and hate him for chaos and busywork in equal measure.

In-person is highly polarized; online is too sparse to settle the debate.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Rewrites and office-hour help can raise essay grades, but many call him a .

Format shift

In-person has both rewrite leniency and ; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Frequent papers, book reviews, projects, and daily-style busywork overwhelm many students.

Format shift

In-person drives the heavy-load narrative; online also tags lots of homework and reading.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Passionate, intellectual, and caring for some; disorganized and , so quality lands in the middle.

Format shift

; online swings from no communication to chill and caring.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Three major essays plus many smaller papers, projects, and .

Format shift

Both formats center writing and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many love his passion and rewrites, and harsh grading.

Main concern

, and heavy essay load are the dominant risks.

What students said

“ .”
ENG205
“If you don't do well on the better grade.”
ENG205
“Terrible Professor, STAY AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
ENGLISH205

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student calls him chill and caring, another reports near-zero communication and broken course setup.

Main concern

Slow fixes and .

What students said

“Absolutely no communication in his online class.”
ENG205
“he is, at least in my experience, a bit hard to contact in the semester.”
ENGL205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly essays and projects; one review notes an testing.

Major essaysRewrite optionOpen-book midterm mentionedDiscussion-based class

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and projects; some note open-book midterm and office-hour rewrites.

Three major essaysRewrite for better gradeOpen-book midtermDiscussion heavy
“he only and a .”
ENG205
“The .”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews emphasize reading and and do not clearly describe proctoring.

Heavy readingLots of homework
“Absolutely no communication in his online class.”
ENG205
“Gomez is a great teacher that helps his students succeed and actually learn something.”
ENGL205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 polarized reviews, emphasizing workload, disorganization, and split teaching praise. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“A very intellectual and open-minded guy.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

48/100

“ .”

📚 Workload

28/100

“If you want to do 40 essays every week, get work every day”

⚖️

38/100

“ and grades hardly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His teaching style and material is unorthodox, but this makes his class special
  • His lectures lead you to think outside of the box
  • Professor Gomez lectures are very politicized and focus on social injustices

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Expect a lot of coursework.
  • If you don't do well on the better grade.
  • Probably the most unfortunate decision I made throughout my college carrier

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • his organization is disastrous.
  • and frequently has you turning in .
  • The and ambiguous.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews over many years with rich detail and stable polarization give strong confidence in the mixed profile.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG2059 reviews
ENG1017 reviews
ENGL2053 reviews
ENGLISH1013 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
Show 3 more courses
CRN863101 review
ENG1051 review
ENGLISH2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 10

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2