AI Rate Professor

English

Mark Jeffers

ENGL101 · ENG101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want real writing growth and can handle tough but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough But Fair FeedbackHilariousEssay HeavyCritical ThinkingBlack American Perspective
  • Most students praise thorough feedback that improves writing even if first drafts score lower.
  • Class is collaborative and joke-filled, but participation and .
  • Strong recommend for ENG101 when you want growth, not a free ride.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Students say an A is reachable if you do the essays and , but he is repeatedly called a .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is approachable yet pushes critical thinking and academic writing beyond easy busywork.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and describe a collaborative class that expects engagement.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

About 86% would take again, citing growth, humor, and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Tough first scores are common, but constructive feedback and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

About four essays plus in-class writing and participation keep the load steady.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students highlight thorough teaching, humor, accessibility, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and on-demand writing rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENG101 focuses on essays, discussion, and critical thinking from a Black American perspective with a funny but demanding instructor.

Main concern

One outlier calls lectures horrible; expect and real writing workload.

What students said

“Don't get fooled by his jokes, he is fun but you gotta do the work.”
ENG101
“Hes a but .”
ENGL101
“Easy A if you just do your stuff”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly essays and in-class writing with .

Essay FocusedIn-Class WritingFeedback Heavy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

writing tasks and heavy feedback.

Four EssaysIn-Class WritingConstructive Feedback
“4 essays and a few in-class on demand writing assignments.”
ENG101
“We write 4 essays and each topic makes you think and look at society from a new perspective.”
ENGL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't get fooled by his jokes, he is fun but you gotta do the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person , and strong recommendations. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Professor Jeffers was thorough in his teachings and willing to answer any questions that we had.”

📝

85/100

“Jeffers will put a and .”

👍 Recommendation

86/100

“I would 100% recommend!”

⚠️ Outlier Dissent

20/100

“His lecture is horrible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Funny guy.
  • He really gets the students to engage and develop critical thinking
  • Good lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he is fun but you gotta do the work
  • but
  • Easy A if you just do your stuff

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Asks how youre doing, he really does like connecting with students.
  • Generally personable guy.
  • very patient

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

but modest sample size yield medium credibility.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1015 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values