AI Rate Professor

English

Kayla Rodriguez

ENG205 · ENG101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will participate and handle a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring & InteractiveParticipation MattersLots of PapersClear FeedbackYoung Inspirational
  • Students praise a welcoming, discussion-driven classroom and strong care for students.
  • ENG205 especially , and .
  • Most would take her again despite occasional communication or critique concerns.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible with engagement, but , and B-range outcomes.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Discussion-based and critical thinking keep the content at a standard college English level.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and stress that participation matters.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

and , and worth it.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some call her a ; others label her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Tags and comments repeatedly mention lots of , and many papers, especially in ENG205.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

87/100

Students highlight interactive discussions, accessibility, and genuine care despite limited experience as a young instructor.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and continuous scheduled work rather than big exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and clear, with heavier workload and tougher grading in upper-level sections.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Really loved professor Rodriguez. She was super into her lessons and had us discuss the topics as a class”
ENG101
“She is a and isnt always specific with critiques.”
ENG205
“ .”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and participation more than traditional proctored exams, with .

Paper HeavyParticipation BasedScheduled Work

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation; exam proctoring details are not clearly described.

Paper HeavyParticipation Based
“She does set an organised schedule of work so you are always busy.”
ENG205
“ and she's a very nice person and .”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really great professor. and . You can tell she really cares about the subject and her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, highlighting care, participation, and paper load. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

87/100

“Her class was a very welcoming and focused environment. .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ ; cool class.”

📝 Workload Load

32/100

“Get ready to read, participation matters”

❤️ About Character

90/100

“Shes a true Gem, and shes the youngest English professor here at Miramar!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was super into her lessons and had us discuss the topics as a class
  • and .
  • Be prepared to be questioned and to think critically.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a and isnt always specific with critiques.
  • Lots of homework, So many papers
  • she's a and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Shes a true Gem
  • Understand and caring for her students
  • Rodriguez cares about what she's teaching

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1014 reviews
ENG2054 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1