AI Rate Professor

English

Jeanelle Horcasitas

ENG160 · ENGL101 · MATH141 · ENG101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you will keep up with readings and participate—skippers struggle.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGet ready to readGives good feedbackCaringSci-fi focusedParticipation matters
  • Sci-fi themed English with lots of reading and papers but and feedback
  • Easy A if you show up, participate, and turn work in; available
  • though one student found lectures monotone and last-minute work heavy

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Multiple students say easy A if , and participate; grades skew A/A+.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

but and papers raise the work demand.

All course-content evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation and peer reviews matter for grades.

In-person only; as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

About 86% would take again; most love the sci-fi focus though a few find delivery dull or workload heavy.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and if work is turned in on time.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of reading, many papers, and ; keep up or fall behind.

Format shift

Workload complaints and .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Passionate sci-fi lectures and ; a minority call delivery monotone.

Format shift

Teaching quality split is only visible in in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and peer reviews rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Assessment pattern drawn from in-person ENG comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, doable papers, and mostly strong praise.

Main concern

High reading and ; one critique of monotone delivery.

What students said

“ and most def an Easy A as long as you turn in your work!”
ENGL101
“Show up, participate, do the ”
ENG160
“ , but .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers, peer reviews, and discussion more than formal exams.

Paper-focusedPeer reviewDiscussion based

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

- and discussion-heavy with peer reviews; formal exam rules are not clearly described.

Essays and papersPeer review sessionsClass discussion
“Always attend the !!! I enjoyed coming to this class!”
ENGL101
“Show up, participate, do the ”
ENG160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and most def an Easy A as long as you turn in your work!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“One of !”

📚 Reading Load

35/100

“Lots of but she's a great teacher!”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“I had Professor H. for English 101 and .”

⚠️ Mixed Experience

40/100

“She has a very monotone voice which makes it hard to focus”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super charming and calm. Her class was centered around science fiction
  • Her lectures were interesting and sci fi being the topic was so fun!
  • Her lecture is alright. Her class is based on discussion.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • most def an Easy A as long as you turn in your work!
  • Ive always hated English classes, yet I got an A in hers.
  • If you think she assigns too much reading, youre going to hate the rest of college.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • SO MANY PAPERS
  • long story) which is not that much.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

7 reviews from 2018-2019 with mixed quality ratings and one very thin comment; consistency is moderate.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1013 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
ENG1601 review
MATH1411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values