AI Rate Professor

English

Brendt Progar

ENG205 · ENGL205 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already write well and want a demanding writing course with little hand-holding.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLecture HeavySo Many PapersUnclear ExpectationsBoring Lectures
  • and
  • Lectures often long, boring, and unclear
  • Students learn academic writing but getting an A is hard

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Even students who earned an A say getting one is tough if you are not already a strong writer.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Content and , and demanding academic writing.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation is graded.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

and several low quality ratings cite boring lectures and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; drafts are not corrected and finals are graded harshly.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and lots of reading.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students , and weak draft feedback despite some willingness to help outside class.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and drafts rather than exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ENG205 features long lecture-heavy sessions, , and limited draft feedback.

Main concern

Unclear expectations and .

What students said

“If your not a great writer this class will be hard for you. You will learn a lot but getting an A will be tough”
ENG205
“Does not correct draft which I found it to be ridiculous as it .”
ENGL205
“ . .”
ENGL205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and drafts; .

Paper-based assessmentNo clear exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment is paper-heavy with rough drafts and ; .

Multiple essaysRough drafts not correctedFinal paper graded only
“Does not correct rough draft. .”
ENGL205
“You will learn a lot but getting an A will be tough”
ENG205

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If your not a great writer this class will be hard for you. You will learn a lot but getting an A will be tough”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝 Tough Writing Load

28/100

“One assign a wk. 4 rough draft. 4 Essays. Lots of reading.”

😴 Lecture Quality Issues

35/100

“Lectures are long and boring. .”

🚫 Low Recommendation

20/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Long and boring lectures. Lots of .
  • Talks too fast. Does not correct rough draft.
  • Personality can be a little aggressive, but means well

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If your not a great writer this class will be hard for you
  • not a professor who'll let you skate

Theme 3

📝

  • Does not correct draft which I found it to be ridiculous
  • Willing to help outside of class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed in-person reviews from 2016-2017 are consistent on difficulty and lecture quality but form a small, older sample.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG2052 reviews
ENGL2052 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values