AI Rate Professor

English

Michele McConnell

E42 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Possibly an easy class, but one review claims a broken reward promise, so treat claims cautiously.

Best fit · Easy A HunterNice PersonalityEasy ClassBroken Final PromiseMixed Trust
  • Only one review exists and calls her nice and easy.
  • The same student says she promised Padres tickets for but never shared scores.
  • Credibility is low with a single dated comment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The only review calls the class easy and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

Described as nice and easy with low difficulty rating.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Nice and easy, but trust was damaged by the alleged broken ticket promise.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Student frames the class as easy overall.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Light

72/100

No heavy workload described; class called easy.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Personality is liked, but the .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Single in-person review describes an .

Main concern

Student alleges she never revealed final scores after promising Padres tickets.

What students said

“ and easy. one thing that was lame was that she promised our class padres tickets to whoever scored highest on the final exams though she never even told us what !!!”
E42

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Only an in-person final is mentioned; .

In-Person Final

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

context.

In-Person Final
“she promised our class padres tickets to whoever scored highest on the final exams though she never even told us what !!!”
E42

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and easy. one thing that was lame was that she promised our class padres tickets to whoever scored highest on the final exams though she never even told us what !!! so she lied to get us to ”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review; limited sample. Credibility rating: Low.

😊 Easy Vibe

78/100

“ and easy.”

⚠️ Trust Concern

40/100

“she lied to get us to ”

🎯 Overall Teaching

55/100

“ and easy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and easy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • promised our class padres tickets to whoever scored highest on the
  • never even told us what

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • so she lied to get us to

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2013 review; insufficient sample and possible single-incident bias.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

E421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values