AI Rate Professor

English

Corinna Evett

ENGL101H · ENGLISH242 · ENGLISH103 · ENGL103 · ENG241 · ENGL242 · ENG102 · ENG242 · ENGL103H · ENG233 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENG103H · ENG103 · 105 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want to grow as a writer and will invest serious weekly hours; avoid if you need an easy English A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderSo Many PapersGet Ready to ReadCaring MentorHeavy Workload
  • many call her inspiring with ; and the load brutal.
  • , and projects more than traditional tests.
  • Online sections draw more workload and nitpick complaints; literature classes often feel more rewarding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Even diligent students report Cs for strong work because .

Online reviews stress nitpicking more; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Constant reading, annotations, essays, and .

; and group project friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Many in-person sections grade participation heavily, while as optional.

In-person leans mandatory participation; online is more flexible but still participation-heavy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

growth-focused students love her, grade-focused students often leave burned.

Recent online honors complaints pull recommendations down versus strong lit course praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

; students say but scores stay harsh.

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

So many papers, nightly annotations, and .

Format shift

Online comments more often call the load full-time incompatible.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

, and care stand out, offset by disorganization and favoritism claims.

Format shift

In-person lit courses rate higher; some online and older ENG103 terms rate poorly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Essays, projects, discussions, and annotations dominate; traditional tests are rare.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person honors and lit courses show strong mentorship and .

Main concern

Participation, endless annotations, and if you under-prep.

What students said

“You will learn so much from her like how to read, write, analyze in a college level”
241
“you can do everything right and still get a c in this class”
ENG103H
“this has ”
ENGL242

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online English sections often feel assignment-heavy with , and uneven satisfaction.

Main concern

Huge reading and students.

What students said

“such a you on. never-ending homework”
ENG102
“as long as you give her that, the class is a breeze”
ENGL101H
“Super heavy workload. A lot of and a lot of group projects”
ENG103H

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly essays and projects rather than closed-book timed tests, but .

Essay-Based ExamsNo Traditional Tests OftenProjects and DiscussionsHeavy Annotations

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as exams and heavy participation; standards stay high.

Essay ExamsParticipation GradedExtra Credit SometimesOffice Hours Feedback
“ ”
ENGL101H
“ and you will be fine”
ENG233

Online

, and reading; few traditional proctored exams mentioned.

Essays and ProjectsDiscussion PostsGroup ProjectsNo Clear Lockdown Proctoring
“The course load was fair, with , and discussion posts”
ENGL101H
“ , but a lot of tedious work”
ENG103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will learn so much from her like how to read, write, analyze in a college level, while also grow as a student and person.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 mixed-format reviews, balancing mentorship praise with workload and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Impact

66/100

“English 101H & 103H boosted my confidence in my writing”

📝 Paper Load

24/100

“She assigns a tremendous amount of work”

⚖️

30/100

“you can do everything right and still get a c, so nitpicky”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“An amazing teacher. and ”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • , and kind
  • She truly cares and loves what she does and students

Theme 2

📚

  • Get ready to read
  • the annotations are endless as well as the amount of essays assigned

Theme 3

⚠️ About Friction

  • Shell tell you to your face that grade
  • RUN AND RUN FAST
  • About 20 students dropped her class this semester

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

105

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across online and and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 547
4 out of 519
3 out of 513
2 out of 511
1 out of 516

Course coverage

ENG10311 reviews
ENG103H11 reviews
ENGL101H4 reviews
2423 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENG2413 reviews
ENG2332 reviews
ENG2422 reviews
ENGL103H2 reviews
ENGL2422 reviews
ENGLISH2422 reviews
2411 review
ENG1021 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGLISH1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 6 · A 15 · A- 4

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1