AI Rate Professor

English

Melissa Sordan

ENGL99797 · ENGL101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-manage a and only need the credit.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized onlineSlow gradingClear rubricsUnresponsiveCaring but ineffective
  • one sweet in-person ENGL101
  • Online sections repeatedly and ignore emails
  • Students still report mostly A grades despite poor structure and little learning

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most reported grades are A despite low quality ratings and disorganization, so marks come without strong teaching.

Both online and ; online still complains about structure.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is essay-and-project based English with low-to-moderate difficulty ratings, not conceptually hard.

In-person ENGL101 cites four essays plus a project; online reviews focus more on missed posts than hard content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory.

; online also flags accessibility issues.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Only about a and comments stress unorganization and little learning.

The sole clear yes is in-person ENGL101; online reviewers say no or stay silent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and many As appear even when teaching quality is rated poorly.

Format shift

Leniency shows across formats; frustration is about pace of .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of and weekly online work keep the load noticeable.

Format shift

In person stresses essays and a project; online stresses weekly posts that often appear late.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Average quality near 2.0 with repeated unorganized and .

Format shift

In-person ENGL101 is warmer; online ENGL sections drive the poor overall experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on essays, projects, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person ranges from clear rubrics and the class horrible.

Main concern

Inconsistent quality and .

What students said

“She made sure to provide a and went through them during class time”
ENGL101
“actually horrible might wanna stick to roblox”
ENGL99797

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe , and unresponsive email support with little learning.

Main concern

Instructor forgets to post work and is hard to reach.

What students said

“ and remind her to post them.”
ENGL99797
“ . Often forgets to post weekly assignments. She was unresponsive to emails”
ENGL99797

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; work is mainly essays and weekly assignments.

Assignment heavyEssay based

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

than formal exam rules.

Essays with rubricsEnd project
“There are a total of 4 essays along with a .”
ENGL101

Online

Online reviews ; focus is missed assignment posts.

Weekly assignments
“ and remind her to post them.”
ENGL99797

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She seems like a nice person but not a good professor. I cant say I learned anything from her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews spanning online and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ . Often forgets to post weekly assignments.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“actually horrible might wanna stick to roblox”

📝 Structure Issues

25/100

“ and remind her to post them.”

Theme 1

🗂️ About Organization

  • Often
  • She was unresponsive to emails and was not assessable to her students

Theme 2

❤️ About Tone vs Results

  • Professor Sordan was very sweet
  • She seems like a nice person but not a good professor
  • I cant say I learned anything from her class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four mixed reviews across 2022-2025 with sparse detail and low consistency.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGL997973 reviews
ENGL1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values