AI Rate Professor

English

Roberta Tragarz

ENGLISH101 · ENGLISH61 · ENGLI101 · ENGL102 · ENG270 · ENG102 · ENG061 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENGL270 · C123Z4 · ENGL061 · 108 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her if and ; skip if you need an easy, low-conflict English credit.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of EssaysPolarizing PersonalityClear Syllabus SticklerHelpful If You Seek Her
  • and volume is high; this is not an easy A English class.
  • , and transformative, others call her rude, vague, or harsh.
  • Attendance and staying on the syllabus matter; office hours help when students use them.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and many B/C outcomes show an A .

In-person evidence dominates; online also reports harsh papers.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and high standards make content and workload intellectually demanding.

Challenge is clearest in in-person ENG101/102/270; online notes heavy writing too.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and say participation and in-class work matter.

Mostly in-person reports; a few .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but quality ratings swing from 1 to 5 with strong emotion both ways.

; online sample is tiny and split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader is the dominant tag; useful.

Format shift

Both formats mention strict papers; online includes one short-temper incident.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and sometimes weekly books create heavy load.

Format shift

In-person children's lit and composition both flag high volume.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Praise for passion, humor, and growth sits beside complaints of vagueness, rudeness, and disorganization.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Essays, papers, and ; .

Format shift

True across formats; online emphasizes papers heavily.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

passionate teaching and strong writing growth for and attitude issues for others.

Main concern

and occasional reports of yelling or unhelpful office interactions.

What students said

“she grades the . Had a great time though, .”
ENG102
“She literally yelled at because I told her I didnt understand her instructions.”
ENG101
“Professor Tragarz was one of about literature.”
ENGL102

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and , others cite harsh papers and camera conflicts.

Main concern

and low patience online, including reported camera-related point docks.

What students said

“Professor and responded quickly on Pronto.”
ENG101
“The papers that you write in this class are graded harshly. She barely gives out any help, and has a short temper (she yelled at me and ).”
ENG102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on strictly graded essays more than high-stakes proctored exams.

Essay HeavyStrict Paper RubricsQuizzes MentionedSyllabus-Driven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and occasional book quizzes more than proctored finals.

Strict EssaysBook QuizzesIn-Class Assignments
“she grades the ”
ENG102
“Barely gives .”
ENG270

Online

Online comments focus on harshly graded papers; one report docks points for no working camera, but .

Harsh Paper GradingCamera Expectation MentionedExtra Credit (one review)
“she yelled at me and ”
ENG102
“She gave many interesting topics for the essays and gave multiple chances for .”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's far from an easy A, but its also not that difficult, just show up be respectful and pay attention.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (3 online, 47 in and persona. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

28/100

“she grades the . Had a great time though, .”

❤️ Passionate Teaching

75/100

“Absolutely loved her class. It is truly a breath of fresh air to find an empathetic professor who is willing to go above & beyond for her students”

⚠️ Harsh Tone Reports

20/100

“Professor Tragarz treats her students like absolute trash and is a .”

📚 Writing Growth

70/100

“I definitely became a better writer with her help!!! I felt confident about my English because I am a ESL student”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and teaches well
  • She is funny and caring
  • She is SUPER friendly and hilarious.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She was however a
  • It's far from an easy A

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • lots of writing assignments
  • SO MANY PAPERS
  • LOTS of work!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

108

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning years with rich detail and stable split themes yield high confidence despite polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 517
3 out of 517
2 out of 517
1 out of 528

Course coverage

ENG10119 reviews
ENG2708 reviews
ENG1024 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews
ENGLISH1013 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENG0612 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
ENGL2702 reviews
ENGLI1012 reviews
ENGLISH612 reviews
1012711 review
C123Z41 review
ENGL0611 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 9

B range

11

B+ 4 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2