AI Rate Professor

English

Scott Hays

ENG99773 · ENG101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if ; expect weak responsiveness and inconsistent guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationVague directionsGhosts emailsMixed feedback qualityEssay heavy
  • vague directions and unanswered emails lead to unfair grade hits.
  • and quizzes; content itself is not always hard.
  • one strong and online communication failures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Content can be easy but vague directions and non-response make earning a good grade unpredictable; one F and one B reported.

Online reviews stress easy work but grade damage from ghosting; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Online work and quizzes called easy, but papers and high difficulty ratings pull intellectual load to average.

Online leans easier content; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

Attendance is repeatedly listed as .

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

and one strongly would not; recommendation hinges .

Online mixed yes; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

One student says grades in students favor; others report tough empty scoring and marks down without answers.

Format shift

Online evidence conflicts; in-person is harshly negative.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

About one 4-page essay per week plus easy quizzes; not light for writing but not overwhelming for all.

Format shift

Online mentions weekly essay; .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Helpful when present for some, but chronic non-response and .

Format shift

One glowing online review is outweighed by ghosting and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly essays, quizzes, and a final; test-heavy tag appears but writing load is central.

Format shift

Online emphasizes quizzes and final; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

no constructive criticism, same score every time, and no improvement guidance.

Main concern

and poor communication.

What students said

“Scott Hays is one of the . He has horrible communication with his students, he gives no direction, doesn't give constructive criticism.”
ENG99773

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ENG101 is split: one student found easy quizzes and and got marked down.

Main concern

Unanswered emails and .

What students said

“I was constantly ghosted by him and his directions are usually vague so I would have lots of questions go unanswered and then get marked down for doing stuff wrong because he never answered my emails.”
ENG101
“ and so is the final if you follow his study guides.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and as easy with study guides; .

Easy quizzesStudy guidesWeekly essaysFinal exam

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on papers and lack of .

Many papersSame score patternLittle constructive criticism
“Seems like as he gives you the same score every time and never gives you direction on how to improve.”
ENG99773

Online

Online quizzes and if you follow study guides; .

Easy quizzesStudy guidesWeekly essay
“ and so is the final if you follow his study guides.”
ENG101
“Expect 1 essay (4pages) a week. Nothing terrible.”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was constantly ghosted by him and his directions are usually vague so I would have lots of questions go unanswered and then get marked down for doing stuff wrong because he never answered my emails.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in-person), highlighting communication failure and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

📵 Communication Fail

25/100

“I was constantly ghosted by him and his directions are usually vague so I would have lots of questions go unanswered.”

📝

20/100

“he gives no direction, doesn't give constructive criticism, Seems like as he gives you the same score every time”

👍 When It Works

70/100

“Very helpful english teacher. Grades in the students favor. and anything english related.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He wants you to succeed. I was very happy attending his course.
  • the work is super easy. But .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expect 1 essay (4pages) a week. Nothing terrible.
  • and so is the final if you follow his study guides.
  • I was always left in the dark.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews spanning 2021-2023 with strongly conflicting experiences reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1012 reviews
ENG997731 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values