AI Rate Professor

English

Sean Smith

ENGLISH61 · ENGLISH60 · ENLG61 · ENG60 · ENG061 · ENG101 · ENG109 · ENGLISH1O1 · ENGENG · ENG3790 · ENGLISH061 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are a strong, thick-skinned writer ready for constant papers and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderPublic Call-OutsHeavy PapersHigh Drop RateUnclear Expectations
  • Many students report humiliation, power trips, and classes shrinking from 30-40 students to under 10.
  • , and graded harshly with vague directions and .
  • A minority of older or more motivated students say hard work pays off and he can teach analytical writing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong students report grinding for B-range grades; As are rare .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and tough analytical standards make the course intellectually and volume-wise hard.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and missing even a day or two can sink you because work is due almost every class.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

Low take-again rate and repeated warnings about humiliation, unclear papers, and .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and vague improvement comments define the grading climate.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

create a heavy, constant writing load.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Some credit analytical growth, but , and unhelpful feedback.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English courses feature heavy daily , and frequent complaints about rudeness and unclear standards.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“ if there is .”
ENG101
“He calls students out during class and publicly humiliates them.”
ENG101
“My class started with 40 students & ended with 9 students.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and occasional pop quizzes rather than classic proctored exams.

Multiple Long PapersReading JournalsPop QuizzesNo Clear Rubric

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

unclear expectations, daily journals, and some pop quizzes.

Long PapersDaily JournalsPop QuizzesVague Feedback
“He assigns 5 LONG papers, gives 2wks to complete each”
ENG101
“ but are not hard.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if there is .”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 in-person reviews with and classroom climate. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ because his teaching was awful.”

⚖️

18/100

“If you do one little thing wrong on a and doesn't care if you fail.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

26/100

“ ”

📉 Classroom Climate

20/100

“He was on consistant power trips, and by the end of the semester it went from probably 30-35 students to 8.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He never explained well the assignments
  • publicly humiliates them

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so many papers
  • only 25% of his students will pass the class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • power trips
  • harass you in front of the whole class
  • the whole class hated him

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-one in-person reviews over many years with , and classroom-climate themes yield high credibility.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ENG10116 reviews
ENGLISH0613 reviews
0611 review
061886971 review
611 review
Show 9 more courses
ENG0611 review
ENG1091 review
ENG37901 review
ENG601 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGLISH1O11 review
ENGLISH601 review
ENGLISH611 review
ENLG611 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 6

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1