AI Rate Professor

English

Elizabeth Elchlepp

ENGLISH101H · ENGL101H · ENG101H · ENGLISH103 · ENG102 · ENGL103H · ENGLISH102H · ENG101 · ENG103H · ENG103 · 90 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
45.71%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid if you want an easy A; if you want rigorous writing practice and can handle strict standards and heavy workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderSo Many PapersHeavy ReadingPolarizing PoliticsWriting Growth for Some
  • Consistently described as a , and structure harshly.
  • , and intense intersession pacing drive many avoid reviews.
  • Motivated writers who use office hours often report real skill gains despite the grind.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students repeatedly say not an easy A; , and structure even with strong content.

Both online positives still require effort; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and honors-level analysis make content and pacing demanding.

Online and and writing load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and participation is frequently required.

; in-person strongly enforces showing up.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

About half who state a ; many others strongly say stay away.

The ; in-person opinions split sharply.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and structure; many report B/C essays that would be A elsewhere.

Format shift

, but tough standards still apply.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Frequent papers, journals, , and brutal intersession pacing.

Format shift

; online still requires steady effort.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

, and growth-focused; many find lectures dry, directions confusing, and tone condescending.

Format shift

Online reviews skew more positive on care and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and journals rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Same paper-heavy pattern online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many ; others say she transforms writing if you work hard.

Main concern

and reading, mandatory participation, and political tension.

What students said

“Prof Elchlepp is a and will knock your grade for small things like margins and punctuation”
ENG103
“ !!!!!”
ENGLISH103
“this is the professor to take. There is a ”
ENG103H

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students who put in , and caring support.

Main concern

Still requires real writing effort and may include political framing some dislike.

What students said

“Professor E is thorough with directions and put in the effort.”
ENG103
“ and wants to help you improve your writing.”
ENGL101H

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly rigorous essays and papers with strict form and grammar standards; .

Essay-heavy gradingGrammar and margin scrutinyWeekly writingNo clear proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

- and reading-heavy with harsh essay standards; closed-book exam policy not clearly proven.

So many papersTough essay gradingHeavy reading
“Very specific about margins and papers if you dont get your margins exactly 1 inch expect a .”
ENG102
“not an easy A, because she is a .”
ENG103H

Online

and effort rather than proctored exams.

Writing feedbackEffort-based success
“ and wants to help you improve your writing.”
ENGL101H

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is notorious for putting essays under a microscope and expects a lot out of students, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (2 online, 48 in and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Personally, I did not like her teaching style. I took this class over zoom and her lectures were hard to stay interested in.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

46/100

“ !!!!!”

⚖️

22/100

“An other English class will get a C In her class.”

📚 Workload Reality

22/100

“She shoved in so much damn work into such a short amount of time”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • confusing and she gets mad if you
  • She's really straight forward in what she wants

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • THIS IS NOT AN EASY CLASS!
  • and will knock your grade for small things like margins
  • you will pass if you put in some effort

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very caring and passionate
  • condescending to any answer you give
  • kind and open-minded

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

90

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years with and paper-load themes, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 521
3 out of 511
2 out of 518
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENG10314 reviews
ENG101H8 reviews
ENG103H8 reviews
ENG1017 reviews
ENGLISH101H4 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENGLISH1033 reviews
ENGL103H2 reviews
ENGLISH102H2 reviews
ENG1021 review
ENGL101H1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

7

C+ 3 · C 4

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 6