AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jim Watkins

PHIL144 · PHIL101 · PHILO110 · PHL110 · COUN140 · COUN144 · CNSL144 · PHIL · PHILOSOPHY108 · COUNCELING144 · PHIL172 · CNSL114 · PHLISOPHY · PHIL3 · PHIL110 · PHIL100 · PHIL106 · COUNS144 · PHILOSOPHY110 · PHILOSOPHY · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you can tolerate rambling lectures and will attend regularly.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy A philosophyOff-topic lecturesAttendance heavyClear syllabusBoring but fair
  • Many students call the class an easy A if , and .
  • Lectures often drift off topic or feel boring; learning value is mixed.
  • Attendance and participation are heavily weighted, so skipping hurts.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Tests from notes, light papers, and and basic effort.

Online review agrees it is easy with work; most Easy A claims are in-person.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Content is introductory and , though some logic sections confuse students.

; the single online review rated medium difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly weighted heavily, sometimes around 20-30 percent.

; detail is mostly in-person.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students split between easy-grade fans and those who found lectures a boring waste of time.

Online review strongly recommends; in-person opinions are mixed around 50 percent take-again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

82/100

Many report easy tests, full credit on short thoughtful papers, and grades higher than expected.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Few major assignments; short papers, quizzes, and notes-based tests keep work modest.

Format shift

Online student still says put in the time; .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

, but many call him boring, rambling, or off-topic.

Format shift

Online review was highly positive; in-person quality is widely mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of notes-based tests, short essays, and high-weighted participation or attendance.

Format shift

In-person details dominate; online review .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews , and lectures that range from funny and clear to boring or off-topic.

Main concern

You may learn little real philosophy while still needing to sit through long lectures.

What students said

“Take this class if you want an easy A. if you want to learn philosophy.”
PHIL110
“Show up to class and and you will be fine”
PHIL100
“Basically, he's not an awful teacher... It was 99% off topic lecture”
PHIL110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One online ethics student loved clear expectations, flexible schedule fit, and said doing the work yields a solid grade.

Main concern

Still requires and work; only one review.

What students said

“It is easy to do well in this class if you put in the time to do the work. I genuinely loved this class.”
PHIL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are widely called easy and drawn from lectures or .

Tests from PowerPoint notesInsultingly easy examsShort one-page papersCumulative quizzes with repeats

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and powerpoints and are frequently called easy or insultingly easy.

Notes-based testsEasy multiple choiceShort essays full creditCumulative with repeated questions
“ ”
PHIL110
“His lectures are on powerpoints and he takes all of ”
PHIL101
“The ...if you read the class notes you will get an A on the tests”
PHIL110

Online

Single online review does not describe exam proctoring or format in .

Clear expectations
“There were no ”
PHIL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take this class if you want an easy A. if you want to learn philosophy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 , and lecture quality. Credibility rating: High.

🅰️ Easy Grade Path

84/100

“This class may have been the easiest class I've taken. The ”

😴 Lecture Boredom

40/100

“Boring, boring class, waste of time, teacher is lazy with , however, easy A.”

📋

75/100

“The syllabus has everything you need to know and more, and he provides a glossary that you can use to study”

🙋

28/100

“Attendance/participation is 30% of total grade!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Watkins is very good at explaining complex ideas in a easy way
  • It was 99% off topic lecture
  • Magnificent teacher who teaches the material is an amusing way

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class... but pretty boring. and you'll be fine
  • If you want an easy A its real straight forward
  • and attendance and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He's really sweet and is totally there for you
  • He will never put you down or make you feel stupid
  • Kinda a crazy guy. Talk to him about the Ducks and he'll love you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

42 reviews across many years with a stable Easy A versus boring-lecture pattern, despite sparse recent grades.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 512
3 out of 57
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PHIL11013 reviews
COUNS1443 reviews
PHIL1003 reviews
PHIL1063 reviews
CNSL1442 reviews
Show 15 more courses
PHIL1012 reviews
PHIL1442 reviews
PHILO1102 reviews
CNSL1141 review
COUN1401 review
COUN1441 review
COUNCELING1441 review
PHIL1 review
PHIL1721 review
PHIL31 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review
PHILOSOPHY1081 review
PHILOSOPHY1101 review
PHL1101 review
PHLISOPHY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1