AI Rate Professor

English

John Cabral

HIST101 · ENGL61 · ENG61 · ENGLI101 · ENG061 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENN101 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you only need an easy credit and can teach yourself writing with almost no useful instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMonotone LecturesOff-Topic VideosBoring ClassEssay HeavyDoes Not Teach Writing
  • Most students find lectures extremely boring and unrelated to English skills.
  • and films about politics or history rather than writing craft.
  • A few students call him nice or lenient, but nearly everyone advises avoiding him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many call the class easy content-wise, but harsh or sparse essay feedback and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intellectual challenge is low for many students, but the class is hard to sit through because lectures rarely match the essay work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, while others say he takes roll and students still walk out early.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students because you will not learn writing and will be bored for the whole term.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

A few call him super lenient, but others say essay grading is harsh, illegible, or nearly comment-free.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Typical load is about five essays plus a , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is monotone, unprepared, off-topic lectures that do not prepare students for essays or exams.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades rest mainly on multiple essays and a and essay-based exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and random videos, with heavy essay load and little writing instruction.

Main concern

, and essays that feel disconnected from English learning goals.

What students said

“ ”
ENG101
“Soooo if possible”
ENG61
“Class started with 45 people, ended with 8”
ENGLI101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly essays and .

Essay MidtermEssay FinalMultiple EssaysResearch Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report midterm and final as and one longer research-style paper.

Essay MidtermEssay FinalMultiple EssaysResearch Paper
“ . The .”
ENGL101
“only 2 test and about 3-4 essays”
ENG61
“5 Essays and ”
ENG61

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 in-person reviews, highlighting boredom, weak writing instruction, and . Credibility rating: High.

😱 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ but has no idea how to teach”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ ”

😴 Boredom Level

10/100

“ unless you want to DIE FROM BOREDOM!”

📝 Workload

32/100

“He gives out an ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Talks monotone the entire time
  • He likes to read to class, watch movies and do nothing
  • tends to go on tangents

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Pretty easy class but all he does is talk
  • Easy class, super lenient, will help you if you ask

Theme 3

🎬 About Class Content

  • watch a lot of videos that have nothing to do with anything you are learning
  • Touches on political topics that does not even relate to english at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty detailed in-person reviews spanning many years show strong consistency about boredom and weak writing instruction.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENG10110 reviews
ENG613 reviews
ENGLI1012 reviews
ENG0611 review
ENGL1011 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGL611 review
ENN1011 review
HIST1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1