AI Rate Professor

English

Jennifer Hawk

ENGN60 · ENG101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and stay on her good side; otherwise the zero-tolerance essay rule is risky.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEssay-or-fail policyCreative discussion classDue-date couponFrequent cancellationsParticipation heavy
  • Missing a .
  • Positive students like her encouragement, discussion circles, and interesting prompts.
  • Reliability issues include many canceled classes and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is reachable with steady essay work and participation, but .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

and discussions, tough if you fall behind but not concept-heavy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as required and absences plus cancellations create friction.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Some love her encouragement and creativity; others warn about absences and zero-tolerance essay rules.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

She puts in effort matching student effort, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, but and participation carry the course.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Encouraging and discussion-driven when present, undermined by cancellations and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Essays and participation dominate; quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

creative discussions and support for and class cancellations.

Main concern

and you can fail; recent terms also report many canceled meetings.

What students said

“ and you fail!”
ENG101
“Awesome profesor. She was very interesting and encouraging when it came to writing ability.”
ENG101
“I drove to school way too many times to find out class was canceled.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay and participation based rather than high-stakes proctored exams.

Research paper instead of finalNo quizzes or testsEssay-focused assessmentOne due-date extension coupon

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and discussion rather than quizzes or a .

Research paper instead of finalNo quizzes or testsEssay-focused assessmentOne due-date extension coupon
“ .”
ENG101
“ .”
ENGN60
“She gives you a coupon to extend one due date.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you miss one it is an instant fail.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person , and reliability issues. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She was very interesting and encouraging when it came to writing ability.”

📝 Essay Rules

40/100

“ if you don't turn in one of the essays.”

👍 Recommendation

52/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she would gather us into a circle and
  • She is into science and music so the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and you fail
  • grades mostly by participation
  • as much effort as you put in she will put in just as much

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Prof Hawk can be demanding but she is easy to talk to
  • don't expect for her to hand you a c just for showing up

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews over several years give mixed but and reliability.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1016 reviews
ENGN601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1