AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

David Kelsey

PHIL144 · PHIL110 · PHILO103 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and tolerate dry, repetitive lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesBad PenmanshipMixed Teaching QualityLight HomeworkPowerPoints Online
  • Students split and and monotone.
  • and , but lectures feel slow and boring.
  • PowerPoints on his website help, yet many .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grading is often fair or easy with , but students say it is not a free A and you .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is not extremely hard, but and lectures do not always clarify them well.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

some call him great with boring, unclear teaching.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students describe grading as easy but fair, not harsh, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Little homework, a few exams, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Praise for approachable style and online slides is offset by frequent complaints of .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and a couple of exams rather than one dominant format.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some praise young, approachable lectures and , while others call him the and monotone delivery.

Main concern

Boring lectures and .

What students said

“He is the . , and i had to learn everything on my own.”
PHIL110
“This guy is seriously a great teacher. He has all the lecture powerpoints available on his website which really help out a lot.”
PHIL110
“ and they're easy to do. , but fair.”
PHIL144

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a small number of exams plus homework and a .

Two ExamsHomework Plus Presentation

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

homework and a presentation; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or strict proctoring.

Two ExamsThree Homework AssignmentsOne Presentation
“it's pretty easy, 2 exams, 3 hw assignments, 1 presentation.”
PHIL144

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the . , and i had to learn everything on my own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2012, highlighting mixed teaching quality and light workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“He doesnt do that good of a job explining what hes teaching or making sure you actually understand it.”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“ .”

📚 Light Workload

72/100

“ , and he's a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures are very boring and he just talks in a monotone voice.
  • He has all the lecture powerpoints available on his website which really help out a lot.
  • he's young so he gets where you're coming from and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is by no stretch an easy "A", and that comes at a price.
  • , but fair.
  • , and he's a .

Theme 3

✍️ About Clarity & Penmanship

  • He has HORRIBLE penmanship.
  • If you have trouble reading material on the board, i suggest you either go to the front or .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed but , yet opinions split and grades are missing.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1444 reviews
PHIL1102 reviews
PHILO1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values