AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

C Banks

PHIL112 · PHIL106 · WORLDRELIGIONS · PHILOSOPHY · PHILPHIL · PHIL110 · PHILOSOPHY112 · PHIL108 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take her for intro philosophy or world religions if and flexible deadlines.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFlexible due datesDiscussion-heavyEntertaining tangentsEasy tests from handoutsPassionate lecturer
  • Most students praise passion, discussion, and if ideas are presented well.
  • Tests and notes.
  • One older review calls content one-sided and factually weak, so viewpoints may polarize.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students repeatedly say reading handouts and presenting ideas well leads to aces, with flexible deadlines and easy midterms.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is discussion and , though tangents and class dynamics can distract.

All difficulty comments are from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; success advice centers on paying attention and reading.

14 in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her for interesting lectures, help raising grades, and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

, and multiple reports of 100%+ scores support lenient grading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

Mostly discussion and and straightforward quizzes or tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

83/100

Students call her passionate, helpful, and entertaining, with one strong outlier calling content one-sided.

Format shift

All teaching comments are in-person.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and handout-based tests.

Format shift

Assessment mix described only in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and high grades when students read and participate.

Main concern

She can digress into tangents, and a minority find her religious viewpoints biased.

What students said

“ .”
PHIL106
“She is very flexible on all due dates.”
PHIL112
“the ; I got a 105% !”
PHIL112

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and and are described as easy.

Take-home quizzesTests from handoutsEasy midtermsFlexible paper deadlines

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests that match handouts.

Take-home quizzesTests from handoutsEasy midterms
“ and the .”
PHIL112
“the ; I got a 105% !”
PHIL112

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you pay attention & do a lot of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading leniency, and easiness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

83/100

“She is so passionate about what she is teaching, really knows her stuff”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ !!”

⚖️

86/100

“She has a wide open mind .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Often rants about Kurt Cobain, rather entertaining.
  • Makes class interesting with fun stories.
  • She goes off on Tangents if you let her.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you pay attention & do a lot of the .
  • I got over 100% on the tests and a 100 on the paper.
  • pretty easy also

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very enthusiastic about the subject matter and always willing to help her students.
  • Cool lady
  • she was very interesting and easy going.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews with consistent praise, but all are from 2004-2011 and lack recent updates.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1064 reviews
PHIL1124 reviews
PHIL1081 review
PHIL1101 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review
Show 3 more courses
PHILOSOPHY1121 review
PHILPHIL1 review
WORLDRELIGIONS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values