AI Rate Professor

English

A. Shamlou

ENG101 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a fair, professional English instructor who runs a real class without fluff.

Best fit · Effort For RewardVery fair graderInspires discussionProfessional lecturerIn-class writing focusNot a stickler
  • Strong subject knowledge with fair, professional teaching style
  • Encourages discussion, writing, and reading without gimmicks
  • Students rate him highly despite solid course difficulty

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Difficulty is solid at 4, but fairness and work.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students rated difficulty high, with assigned reading, writing, and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed from comments.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The only review is strongly positive and calls him a professional teacher who is doing it right.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Described as very fair and not a stickler rather than harsh or picky.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

In-class writing, movies, discussion, and but not overwhelming load.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students praise subject mastery, discussion leadership, and a professional non-gimmicky style.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment emphasis appears to be in-class writing and discussion rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENG101 felt fair and professionally run, with discussion, writing, and film-based activities.

Main concern

Only one dated review limits how much you can generalize.

What students said

“He knows his subject, inspires in-class discussion, and is VERY fair.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize writing and .

In-class writingReading discussion

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; assessments center on in-class writing and discussion of readings.

In-class writingReading discussion
“He gave in-class writing assignments, watched movies, in-class discussion about assigned reading.”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I liked this guy. He knows his subject, inspires in-class discussion, and is VERY fair.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting fairness and professional teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is doing it right. He was not gimmicky or a comedian.. just a professional teacher as he ought to be.”

⚖️

72/100

“He knows his subject, inspires in-class discussion, and is VERY fair.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“I would give him an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • inspires in-class discussion
  • just a professional teacher as he ought to be
  • not gimmicky or a comedian

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • VERY fair
  • not a stickler at all either
  • I would give him an A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2009 with solid detail but no corroboration or grade data.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values