AI Rate Professor

Education

Carol Von Brandt

F3431 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you can follow the syllabus precisely and handle a no-nonsense, high-demand online education course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderInflexibleHeavy ReadingNo Late WorkParticular Rubrics
  • , and exact formatting with little late-work flexibility.
  • Mixed care for the and accommodation complaints.
  • Online-only sample is small, so confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students still finish with As, but and perfectionist standards make an easy A unlikely.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

High difficulty ratings and heavy reading plus particular assignment expectations raise the intellectual and process load.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and stress participation and no-nonsense deadlines.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Only about one in experience unfair or horrible.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

; work can still be marked unsatisfactory despite heavy effort.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of reading, papers, and exact requirements with little room for late submissions.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Cares about the field, but many , and inflexible policies.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Papers, reading, and precise assignment formats drive the experience more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online-only evidence; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

passion for the subject exists, but toughness, inflexibility, and communication gaps dominate.

Main concern

Inflexibility on accommodations, late work, and .

What students said

“Don't expect to turn in anything late. This is a no nonsense teacher but she has a passion for her subject.”
f3431
“This professor is not a fair instructor. She did not acknowledge my accommodation, was extremely inflexible”
f3431
“This professor requires a lot and at the end of the day she is still not happy with the work you do.”
f3431

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and ; test-heavy tags appear but details are thin.

Test Heavy (Mentioned)Assignment DrivenNo Late Work

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online comments stress tough grading and heavy work more than proctoring; .

Test Heavy (Tagged)Heavy Papers
“This professor requires a lot and at the end of the day she is still not happy with the work you do.”
f3431
“Overall easy course, but she is particular about how she wants work done.”
f3431

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall horrible experience and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 online-only reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“she has a passion for her subject.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“Overall horrible experience and .”

⚖️

26/100

“This professor requires a lot and at the end of the day she is still not happy with the work you do.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload & Rules

  • Get ready to read
  • Don't expect to turn in anything late
  • So many papers

Theme 2

💬 About Communication

  • doesn't provide feedback when asked how an
  • Study the Syllabus first

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four recent online reviews for one course code; themes are consistent but sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

f34314 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values