AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Laura Tulledo-Johnson

ADS15 · ADS17 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a tough, fair addiction-studies mentor; sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAI-scanner strictPolarizing by formatTough but fair gradingHeavy papersCaring in person
  • and strong lectures while warning hard against AI use.
  • Online reviews are mixed-to-negative with reports of , and .
  • Grades skew high (mostly A/A+) but workload and difficulty stay high, so the A is not free.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Nearly everyone reported A/A+ but only after tough work, no AI, and .

; in person still requires real work and zero AI.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students rate difficulty high with , and AI-scanned exams.

One online ADS-15 review called it easy and self-paced; most other sections feel hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory while online sections usually list it as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but online reviews warn of chaos and power-trip dynamics.

In-person reviews are enthusiastic; online reviews are the main drag on recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

, but AI use earns zeros and standards stay firm.

Format shift

In person stresses fair-but-strict AI policy; online quality of .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated tags and comments , and constant rework expectations.

Format shift

Online ADS-17 especially flags many papers; one online ADS-15 felt lighter and self-paced.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

reports of lost control and inconsistent approach.

Format shift

Teaching quality is excellent in person and mixed-to-poor online.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of weekly papers, quizzes with materials allowed online, plus AI-scanned midterms and finals.

Format shift

Online leans assignments and open-material quizzes; in person stresses scanned midterms and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ADS-15 is highly recommended: if you actually do it without AI.

Main concern

Tough workload plus zero tolerance for and finals.

What students said

“Laura is an amazing professor. but if you do the work and don't use A.I she will know and give you cudos!”
ADS-15
“Professor TJ is amazing and .”
ADS-15

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and one highly negative power-trip report mixed with one self-paced easy class.

Main concern

, and uneven instructor engagement online.

What students said

“She changes everything almost daily, gaslights students.”
ADS-17
“Self paced class with no deadlines... Can use materials for quizzes. Overall, easy class just make sure you stay on top.”
ADS-15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes can allow materials, but midterms and tolerance.

AI scanning on examsOpen materials on some quizzesMidterms and finals scanned for AI

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals are scanned for AI and AI use gets a zero.

AI scanning on midterms and finalsZero for AI use
“Do not use A.I. or you will get a zero. and .I.”
ADS-15
“She has a program that checks A.I so do not use it.”
ADS-15

Online

One online ADS-15 review says materials are allowed for quizzes; .

Open materials for quizzesAI-assisted grading of papers
“Can use materials for quizzes. Overall, easy class just make sure you stay on top.”
ADS-15
“Seems to use AI to grade all of our paperwork, so I don't actually know what she thinks of my work.”
ADS-15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor TJ is amazing and . She gives great lectures and great feed back. Her assignments are well balanced, and she is fair. Do not use A.I. or you will get a zero.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (3 online, 2 in person), highlighting modality split, AI policy, and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

58/100

“Laura is an amazing professor. but if you do the work and don't use A.I she will know and give you cudos!”

⚠️ Online Instability

25/100

“She changes everything almost daily, gaslights students. She causes a lot of students to have Mental Health issues with her teaching ways.”

📝 Workload Reality

28/100

“I've had her for almost every ADS class, and I can see the and effort put towards her classes.”

🅰️ Grades vs Effort

72/100

“Overall, easy class just make sure you stay on top.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and her .
  • She gives great lectures and great feed back.
  • her approach needs work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • her workload is tough but if you do the work
  • Do not use A.I. or you will get a zero.
  • So many papers

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • She changes everything almost daily
  • Self paced class with no deadlines.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only five recent detailed reviews with and grade reports, but opinions diverge sharply by modality.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ADS-153 reviews
ADS-172 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 4 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values