AI Rate Professor

English

Leroy Perkins

ENGLISH1C · ENGL1C · ENGL3996 · ENG1B · ENG1CONLINE · F2045 · ENGL1BAND1C · ENG1C · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
53.57%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take him only if you love writing craft and can handle subjective critique; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSubjective tough graderEssay heavyNo textbooksCreative writing focusPolarizing feedback
  • Students are sharply split between life-changing writing mentorship and .
  • Course and little traditional structure.
  • ; non-English majors and students wanting clear rubrics often struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Even strong students , so an A usually needs major rewrite work.

Both formats show tough, opinion-heavy grading with only occasional easy-path comments.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but critical thinking and revision demands keep it from feeling easy.

Online can feel simpler on logistics .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

as not mandatory, especially online, though some require it.

Online is more flexible; some in-person and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Roughly half would retake him, with praise for growth-focused writers and .

Polarization is similar online and in person rather than format-driven.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

, and opinion-based scores dominate student frustration.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly or modular essays and peer review create steady writing load without huge textbook work.

Format shift

; few other assignment types.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching quality splits between inspirational writing mentorship and rude or .

Format shift

Both formats show the same love-or-hate teaching split.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Grades rest almost entirely on essays, drafts, and peer review with .

Format shift

Essay focus is consistent online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some call him excellent and and harsh.

Main concern

Subjective scoring and strict punctuation expectations punish students seeking cookie-cutter English.

What students said

“This class teaches you how to really write, and I'm grateful for it.”
ENG1CONLINE
“ unless you are an English major.”
ENG1C
“He's a nice guy but way to selective and opinion based to be a good teacher.”
ENG1C

Remote format

Online

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ENG1C is essay intensive with strong feedback for receptive writers and .

Main concern

Subjective topic interest and vague rubrics make grades feel unpredictable online.

What students said

“He takes the and .”
ENGL1C
“This teacher has a bias towards English major students. and your thinking on a personal level.”
ENG1C
“This professor only grades you on his opinion!”
ENG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper-driven with limited traditional testing, but .

Essay basedDrafts and peer reviewOccasional final on fallaciesOpen topic writing

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections also center on multiple papers and .

Many papersSubjective essay gradingOpen topics
“Took this .”
ENG1C
“Many of my classmates struggled with his class”
ENG1CONLINE

Online

Online work is mostly weekly essays with drafts and peer review; a few mention a .

Weekly essaysRough then final draftsPeer reviewPossible fallacies final
“Every week we would write an and a .”
ENGL1C
“ and will hurt your grade if you do poor.”
ENGL1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class teaches you how to really write, and I'm grateful for it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

24/100

“This professor only grades you on his opinion!”

✍️ Writing Growth

52/100

“He takes the and .”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ of learning from.”

🚫

34/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • TRUE writing professor
  • and encourages his students
  • little to no guidance for the course

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • grades based

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Wonderful teacher and he cares about his students
  • Very rude and seems quick to judge.
  • He's a tough cookie but he's a !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty long-span reviews with consistent polarization patterns make the overall profile highly credible.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 59
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENG1C18 reviews
ENGL1C17 reviews
ENGLISH1C7 reviews
ENG1CONLINE4 reviews
ENG1B1 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGL1BAND1C1 review
ENGL39961 review
F20451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 2 · B- 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1