AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Roger Gerard

CULA66 · HOSP60 · CULA60 · CULA73 · HOSP30 · HOSP55 · CULACULA · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you like stories and structure; be ready for and strict grading online.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderReading HeavyEngaging StoriesParticipation DailyHospitality Focus
  • In-person hospitality and culinary classes often feel personable and story-driven.
  • and tough quizzes.
  • , so fit depends on course format and work tolerance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is realistic if you follow instructions and stay current, but and .

Online reviews emphasize barely passing and daily .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not elite-theory hard, but and .

Online is reading and quiz heavy; by course.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, while others do not clearly enforce it.

Online HOSP60 expects daily posting; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Half the signal is warm praise for help and .

In-person recommendations are warmer; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Tough grader tags and comments about quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

, and frequent posting create a substantial weekly load.

Format shift

Online reviews describe the heaviest ongoing workload; .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students split between engaging, informed hospitality teaching and snobby or low-effort impressions.

Format shift

In-person story-driven praise is stronger; online teaching is less celebrated.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades mix discussions, quizzes/tests, and participation .

Format shift

Online assessments emphasize reading quizzes and daily posts; and occasional quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

snobby or empty complaints, with stronger praise for wine and hospitality storytelling.

Main concern

Personality fit varies; a few students find him uppity or simply rate low without detail.

What students said

“A wonderful guy with lots of great stories and engaging lectures.”
HOSP55
“Constantly challenging me to do better in class, and made a the third week of class.”
CULA73
“Kinda snobby, good class if you are into wine.”
CULA66

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online classes center on heavy chapter reading, daily discussions, and .

Main concern

and dense quizzes make online sections feel high-pressure.

What students said

“ of quizzes/tests, and a lot of discussions. I barely passed that class.”
CULA60
“A bad three days can seriously hurt your grade, login every day and post every day.”
HOSP60

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on reading-based quizzes and discussions more than clearly student-friendly open-book exams.

Chapter QuizzesDiscussion PostsReading Based TestsSyllabus Strict

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and occasional quizzes but do not clearly prove proctoring style.

Weekly DiscussionOccasional Quiz
“We were assigned a .”
HOSP55

Online

Online quizzes are described as in-depth and as final.

In-Depth QuizzesDaily PostsSyllabus Final
“70% of the and .”
HOSP60
“ of quizzes/tests, and a lot of discussions.”
CULA60

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A wonderful guy with lots of great stories and engaging lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews (2 online, 6 in , and hospitality teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

📖 Reading Load

36/100

“ of quizzes/tests, and a lot of discussions.”

🗣️ Engaging Host

55/100

“A wonderful guy with lots of great stories and engaging lectures.”

⚖️

34/100

“A bad three days can seriously hurt your grade, login every day and post every day.”

🍷 Specialty Fit

50/100

“Great culinary arts instructor, particularly in the area of wine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Always willing to help his students!
  • Very personable!
  • He is very informed but can come of as very uppity.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I barely passed that class.
  • Do your work, follow instructions, and you'll get a good grade.
  • Read the chapter and the .

Theme 3

📚 About Work Pattern

  • and discuss on the chapters he assigns.
  • login every day and post every day
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only eight reviews spanning many years, several with thin comments, so conclusions rest on limited mixed evidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HOSP602 reviews
CULA601 review
CULA661 review
CULA731 review
CULACULA1 review
Show 2 more courses
HOSP301 review
HOSP551 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values