AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Andrew Jolliff

STATS1 · S1548 · S1542 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

If stats or and wants you to succeed.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing at explaining mathAlways ready to helpClear grading criteriaAccessible outside classSkip class and you struggle
  • Perfect 5/5 quality across all reviews with 100% would-take-again.
  • and math clearly for students who struggle with concepts.
  • , but he is flexible with deadlines and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students commonly report As with and strong support, though showing up and engaging still matter.

Online evidence is one flexible summer A; in-person reviews dominate and also report high grades with support.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Stats can feel different and broad, but he breaks concepts down so struggling students can follow.

Online student rated difficulty 5 while working full-time; in-person difficulty ratings were mostly 1-2.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and tags say skip class and you will not pass, even though he helps after absences.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

and many call him the best math teacher for required stats.

Strong recommendation is consistent across the single online review and all in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, and multiple A or A- grades with helpful support.

Format shift

; sample is small online.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload is manageable with flexibility, but attendance and staying engaged are important.

Format shift

Online reviewer balanced three classes plus full-time work; in-person comments focus more .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

, and consistently clear lectures.

Format shift

Quality is 5/5 in both online and in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

and feedback more than pure exam weight, without detailed assessment breakdowns.

Format shift

Neither format gives a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and fun engagement; repeatedly called the best math teacher at Shasta.

Main concern

Tags and comments warn that skipping class makes passing much harder.

What students said

“Professor Jolliff is always ready to help and .”
STATS1
“He is an amazing teacher and is really good at explaining math to people who struggle with math concepts and formulas.”
S1542
“If !!! :)”
STATS1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Summer online STATS1 felt flexible with deadlines while balancing work and other classes; student earned an A and called him 10/10.

Main concern

and course difficulty was rated high by the sole online reviewer.

What students said

“Andrew was very amenable with my work and other class schedules and was flexible with some of the works deadlines. Andrew is ! 10/10!”
STATS1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or ; and clear criteria.

Clear grading criteriaAttendance-linked success

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

software or book policy; they stress showing up and asking questions.

Clear grading criteriaAttendance expected
“he helps you succeed in this class, even if you missed a day .”
S1548

Online

and flexible deadlines in the sole online review.

Clear grading criteriaFlexible deadlines
“Andrew was very amenable with my work and other class schedules and was flexible with some of the works deadlines.”
STATS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If !!! :)”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews spanning 2019-2024, highlighting teaching clarity and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“His teaching style is amazing and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“Andrew is ! 10/10!”

🧠 Clarity for Struggling Students

90/100

“he is really good at explaining math to people who struggle with math concepts and formulas.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His teaching style is amazing and .
  • he is really good at explaining math to people who struggle with math concepts and formulas.
  • he makes class fun and interesting, so it's easy to stay engaged.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support & Character

  • Professor Jolliff is always ready to help and .
  • Andrew has been the
  • he helps you succeed in this class, even if you missed a day .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If !!! :)
  • I will be taking math 14 next semester with him and him only. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews from 2019-2024 are fully consistent at 5/5, but the small sample and only one online review limit certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

STATS13 reviews
S15421 review
S15481 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1