AI Rate Professor

History

Aaron Maready

HISTORY17B · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Prefer him in person if possible; online sections draw mixed and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFormat DependentExtra CreditTough Grader OnlineAccessibleFair In Person
  • In-person students love him for easy As with participation and
  • Online students report nitpicking, harsh tone, and
  • Same course can feel like two different professors by format

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

In person can be an easy A with participation and , but online feels nitpicky and harder.

; and nitpicking.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings split hard online (4) versus easy in person (1), averaging moderate challenge.

Online difficulty rated 4; in-person difficulty rated 1.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and in-person success hinges on showing up and participating.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One glowing in-person yes and one strong online rejection leave recommendation format-dependent.

In-person strongly recommends; online calls it the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

In person called fair with ; .

Format shift

; in person: fair grader with .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Manageable if you attend and and term paper; .

Format shift

Online tags get ready to read; in person focuses on discussions and term paper.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Split between 1 and 5 quality: accessible but rude online, beloved in person.

Format shift

Online quality 1; in-person quality 5.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of discussions, term paper, participation, and a last-day test with pizza party.

Format shift

Evidence from both formats mentions participation and written work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

A for showing up and participating.

Main concern

Attendance and participation appear required for the easy path.

What students said

“Maready gave me one of the my life.”
History-17B
“As long as you showed up and participated in class, the descussions and do the .”
History-17B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online student found heavy nitpicking, rude tone, and high difficulty despite accessibility.

Main concern

Harsh tone and .

What students said

“this one was by far the . The course work was alright but he nitpicks a lot.”
History-17B
“Although his tone in .”
History-17B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and term paper noted; .

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Participation, discussions, term paper, and a .

Term PaperParticipationExtra CreditLast-Day Test
“As long as you showed up and participated in class, the descussions and do the .”
History-17B

Online

Reviews do .

“The course work was alright but he nitpicks a lot.”
History-17B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you showed up and participated in class, the descussions and do the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person) with opposite tones. Credibility rating: Low.

🔀 Format Split

50/100

“this one was by far the ”

🍕 In-Person Win

90/100

“Maready gave me one of the my life.”

📝 Path

75/100

“He is a and he gives lots of too.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • this one was by far the
  • he nitpicks a lot
  • his tone in

Theme 2

🏫

  • you can get an easy A
  • Pizza party for last day during the last test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 recent reviews with polar opposite formats and quality scores, so confidence is limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

History-17B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1