AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Melissa Markee

AGNR51 · AGNR60 · AGNR61 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

agriculture or environmental science experience; avoid her fully online sections if you need flexibility.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveStrong in personWeak online communicationExtra credit availableTests need study
  • , and easy enjoyable classes
  • , and condescending tone
  • Tests require studying but homework and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students earn A or A+ with , and study guides, though .

In-person reviews show easier As with ; online reports tougher nitpicky deductions.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is often called easy and fascinating with and few fun assignments, though some semesters feel packed.

; online notes long chapters and timed quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

and participation points tied to showing up.

Evidence mixes mandatory and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Strong in-person praise outweighs online frustration, landing near the .

; several online reviews withhold or refuse recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

and clear criteria help, but online tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

In person feels fair and generous; online feels nitpicky.

Workload

Light

72/100

Often only a and easy labs, though tests require real study time.

Format shift

In ; online adds frequent check-ins and reading.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Passionate clear lectures and delayed online communication.

Format shift

ratings.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and tests that need study guides.

Format shift

Online leans more on quizzes and discussions; in person balances labs and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students , and enjoyable with , and digestible lectures.

Main concern

and heavy lecture content that still require study.

What students said

“Melissa is a wonderful and caring teacher. I took Environmental Science with her and it was the easiest and most interesting class I've ever taken.”
AGNR60
“She grades without any bias and gives ample opportunities.”
AGNR51

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections draw complaints about , and inconvenient deadlines despite manageable difficulty.

Main concern

Strict multi-check-in rules and and parents.

What students said

“Very nitpicky. if you don't check in multiple times throughout the week.”
AGNR60
“she rarely communicated with the class and took weeks if not months to grade anything.”
AGNR60

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard closed-style assessments where studying the guide matters and .

Study guide providedTests need studyingNon-cumulative finalTimed online quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; study guides are supplied and the .

Study guideTests need studyingNon-cumulative final
“so long as you study for the ... She will supply a study guide.”
AGNR60
“ . .”
AGNR60

Online

and short windows, plus paragraph answers.

Timed quizzesLong chaptersFew graded items
“you are only given 20 minutes to 7-10 questions, as well as write a paragraph for the last answer.”
AGNR60

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Melissa is a wonderful and caring teacher. I took Environmental Science with her and it was the easiest and most interesting class I've ever taken.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting in-person care versus online friction. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Support

74/100

“She cares about her students and uplifts them. She is very knowledgeable and will work with you to help you succeed.”

🖥️ Online Friction

40/100

“Very nitpicky. if you don't check in multiple times throughout the week.”

📝 Boost

78/100

“She grades without any bias and gives ample opportunities.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her teaching style is fairly laid back, which makes difficult topics easily digestible and relatable.
  • Clearly very knowledgeable about most topics.
  • Awesome professor! ... She's very enthusiastic and has a wide range of knowledge in NR.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • with only 4 quick & fun hw assignments the entire semester.
  • Easy A but not enjoyable, waste of time.
  • . Make sure you study.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • Comes across a bit condescending imo. Not a fan.
  • She rarely left feedback but .
  • my work hasn't been manually graded in a long time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews spanning 2017-2026 with and detailed comments support a solid medium-high credibility.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AGNR6010 reviews
AGNR515 reviews
AGNR611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 7 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1