AI Rate Professor

English

Diana Christensen

ENGL1B · DAN40A · F8177 · ENG1B · DAN20A · ENG1C · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you want a very hard paper load and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of PapersLate FeedbackVague SyllabusLecture Heavy
  • Most English reviews , and
  • Would-take-again sits near 27% with many low quality scores
  • A few dance and older reviews are warmer, but English 1B complaints dominate

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Multiple students say it is very hard to score above a .

Online also reports late grading; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and major-level expectations make the content hard for a GE English class.

; one online review also flags lots of homework.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

Both the online review and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

27/100

About a while most English reviews urge caution or regret.

In-person English feedback is largely negative; the single online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and comments that even strong effort rarely earns above a B on papers.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

So many papers, lots of homework, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work; online also flags lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Quality averages about 2.6 with complaints of vague lectures, personal digressions, and inadequate structure, despite a .

Format shift

; dance reviews are mixed to positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Papers, peer reviews, and emphasis.

Format shift

and in-person English courses.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English students mostly report tough grading, many papers, vague lectures, and ; a .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Good luck trying to get anything over a .”
ENGL1B
“Incredibly vague syllabus.”
ENG1B
“She makes the class harder than it has to be.”
ENGL1B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online ENG1C student found the , and .

Main concern

Hard to reach and .

What students said

“Almost impossible to get a hold of, . Online set up wasn't clear and .”
ENG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not clearly prove proctored exam software.

Paper heavyFew graded itemsLate paper feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and limited timely feedback; formal exam format is not clearly described.

So many papersTough paper gradingGraded by few things
“Good luck trying to get anything over a .”
ENGL1B
“Incredibly vague syllabus.”
ENG1B

Online

Online ENG1C focused on papers with unclear setup and ; .

Paper heavyLate gradingUnclear online setup
“Almost impossible to get a hold of, . Online set up wasn't clear and .”
ENG1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good luck trying to get anything over a . Teaches this class like we are fully pledged english majors and doesnt give a lot of turn in the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (1 online, 10 in , and mixed warmth. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Recommendation Risk

27/100

“ but its required”

📝

22/100

“Good luck trying to get anything over a .”

⏱️

25/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Load

22/100

“Way too tough and expects way too much.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Incredibly vague syllabus
  • Talks about personal life too much
  • her teaching is a mess

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Good luck trying to get anything over a
  • Way too tough and expects way too much

Theme 3

❤️ Mixed Personality Notes

  • and fair
  • She bought us pizza with her own money
  • seems like a nice person, but her teaching is a mess

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews from 2016-2026 with rich detail and consistent English-course themes give solid confidence despite some course mix.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1B4 reviews
ENGL1B3 reviews
DAN20A1 review
DAN40A1 review
ENG1C1 review
Show 1 more courses
F81771 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2