AI Rate Professor

English

Kiara Koenig

ENG1A · ENGL31F8171 · ENGL31 · ENGL1C · ENG4855 · ENG1B · ENG1AENG31 · ENGLISH31 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid for core composition if and ; only consider if you already love writing and can handle tough, sparse comments.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderSlow gradingLittle actionable feedbackLots of homeworkMixed creative writing love
  • Recent composition students call her a
  • Older creative writing reviews are warmer about fun prompts and help
  • Take-again intent is low and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Tough grader tags, incomplete and B- outcomes, and and uncertain.

; recent in-person composition reviews are especially harsh.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty spans easy creative writing to heavy reading-writing composition loads rather than pure intro ease.

Online creative writing often feels easier; in-person composition is described as harder and homework-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warn that skipping means you will not pass.

reviews; online is mixed or not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

and several students urge finding another professor.

Older creative writing praise is outweighed by later composition frustration in both formats.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and graded-by-few-things tags dominate, with little constructive path to improve.

Format shift

Online and in-person composition reviews .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of homework, heavy reading and writing, and .

Format shift

In-person ENG1A/1B especially stress homework volume; online creative writing still has many assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Quality spans rockstar early praise to later frustration over delays and unhelpful comments.

Format shift

In-person recent composition is colder; some online creative writing reviews remain warmer.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Student comments center on papers, peer reviews, and writing exercises more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments over clearly described exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person and labeled composition and , while some older lit and writing students still praise her intelligence and energy.

Main concern

Tough grading with little constructive advice and .

What students said

“Koenig is a . She only states what you did wrong. No advice.”
ENG1B
“Never taking it with this teacher again”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections mix tough subjective grading in composition with easier creative writing vibes and .

Main concern

Slow grading and .

What students said

“ , and does not usually give advice on how to write better--simply just states what is wrong with it, and not how to fix it.”
ENGL1C
“Horrible teacher. Weeks or months behind in .”
ENGL31

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and a .

Writing-focused assessmentsFinal assumes outside writing practice

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final that assumes outside writing rather than clear proctoring details.

Tough paper gradingWriting-heavy final
“ outside of class”
ENGL31
“She only states what you did wrong. No advice.”
ENG1B

Online

Online comments and feedback, not webcam or Lockdown Browser rules.

Paper feedback delaysPeer review setup
“How she set up the peer reviews where the writers .”
ENGLISH31
“Weeks or months behind in .”
ENGL31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Trust me, find another professor, there are MUCH and are focused on content over minute problems.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting grading toughness, workload, and mixed creative writing praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

28/100

“Koenig is a . She only states what you did wrong. No advice.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“Never taking it with this teacher again”

📝

40/100

“Horrible teacher. Weeks or months behind in .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's way intelligent too
  • I loved the online creative writing class
  • Extremely interesting class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Theme 3

⏱️

  • Weeks or months behind in
  • so it's difficult to know where you actually stand

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years give solid coverage, but older creative-writing praise and newer composition complaints reduce full consistency.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGL316 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
ENG1B3 reviews
ENG1AENG311 review
ENG48551 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGL1C1 review
ENGL31F81711 review
ENGLISH311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1