AI Rate Professor

Theater

Jessica Wiechman

F0934 · THTR1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid her intro theater lecture sections unless you already know the course format and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnclear expectationsLiterature-heavy theaterStrong feedback when engagedUnreliable due dates
  • Three of four reviews rate her a 1 and .
  • Online THTR1 students report unclear grading, random due-date changes, and .
  • One in-person performance class raves about fun teaching and and course split.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students report and , so an A takes constant vigilance even when content is not deep.

and ; one in-person student still earned an A while hating the class.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The work is mostly reading plays, discussions, and .

Online and as literature-heavy rather than skill-hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

At , and participation tags appear across formats.

In-person THTR1 explicitly notes mandatory attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Three of four students say no and describe unprofessional or mismatched course experiences.

; in-person is split between one rave and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Multiple students tag her a and say she .

Format shift

; the glowing in-person review does not contradict it.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Reviews mention lots of , and group work that feels heavier than expected for intro theater.

Format shift

; online also flags discussion scoring.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most students call the class unprofessional or one of the and fun.

Format shift

Online is consistently poor; one in-person performance section is excellent while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and participation more than formal exams.

Format shift

Neither .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

one student calls her performance class the like a literature slog.

Main concern

Course content can feel like reading-heavy literature rather than hands-on theater.

What students said

“Truly this is the campus.”
F0934
“This class is not about theater it is basically a literature class less the essays.”
THTR1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online THTR1 students describe unprofessional grading, shifting due dates, and .

Main concern

and last-minute due-date changes make the online experience feel unfair.

What students said

“Professor is unprofessional and grades heavily. Just wanted to try out a theatre class but hated it.”
THTR1
“She changes due dates randomly so that things are due that day that weren't originally due for another week.”
THTR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on assignments and discussions rather than formal exams, so .

Discussion-based gradingPlay reviewsUnclear point deductions

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Homework-heavyParticipation matters
“This class is not about theater it is basically a literature class less the essays.”
THTR1

Online

Online comments emphasize discussions and exams.

Discussion postsUnclear gradingSyllabus assignments not always used
“Don't expect full points on any discussion either, she .”
THTR1
“its just reviewing plays and you dont even do the .”
THTR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher has no idea what she's doing. She changes due dates randomly so that things are due that day that weren't originally due for another week.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (2 online, 2 in person), highlighting a sharp quality split by course format. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“This is literally probably one of the worst classes I have taken at Shasta College in two years.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“Beware of this professor”

⚖️

22/100

“she .”

🌈 Positive Outlier

90/100

“ , and makes class fun.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor is unprofessional and grades heavily
  • Im absolutely in love with how she teaches
  • This teacher has no idea what she's doing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

🎭 About Course Content

  • its just reviewing plays
  • basically a literature class less the essays
  • Truly this is the campus

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews split by format and course type, with sharp disagreement and limited long-term consistency.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

THTR13 reviews
F09341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1